Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2015 12:40:45 GMT
Yes, heathen, please join us. Many of us have received the same treatment at IFERS, but usually worse, because our banning came after advertising their forum and writing hundreds of posts on it. We are glad to read respectful, reasonable, logical non-flat earthers, who are serious and do not joke around like they do on TFES. You'd probably end up being convinced of flat earth anyway. Another non-flat earther joined us yesterday, aliveandkicking. He was making intelligent non-flat earth remarks on TFES and got ridiculed as is usually the case (also with flat earthers), so I invited him here. Regarding the attacks to Mark Sargent, I got banned for defending him, because we cannot be sure he is an agent, so maybe we should not even bring the "shill" accusation up, but just address his content, and say whether we agree or not. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2015 19:59:02 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/3764/threadI can not debunk it because I am not video-animation-studio- special- effect specialist.... I just hope somebody will do it. YOU created the TOPIC and you want someone to debunk, Fake Ball Earth. WHY? Get ready to welcome another new member... their kangaroo court is about to convene again. If someone is stil in touch with @aleksandar2015, tell him to join us.
|
|
|
|
Post by efrohi on Apr 12, 2015 20:15:04 GMT
LOL ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2015 23:40:38 GMT
Now it is not even enough to be against Jews to be welcomed at IFERS. You either write "I agree with everything you said" or, even after blaming the Jews, you risk being attacked: ifers.boards.net/post/3646/threadI've recently got into the flat earth theory but one thing I've noticed is despite the fantastic work that has been done on the flat earth theory , its attached to this knights of malta jesuit nonsense . You say anyone can be a jew . You may want to research that statement because its incorrect . To be granted citizenship to Israel requires a DNA test ! This is to discern whether you are genetically jewish enough ! Sound mad ? Jews have a unique disease , similar to sickle cell in black people as it only affects them , called tay sachs . I don't hate jews by any stretch , in no way am i saying that its ALL jews . But you wanna know who's running the show well you better believe it. Show me a jesuit ? I will show you the head of your federal reserve , or any investment bank , or any bank for that matter . This has nothing to do with flat earth really , I just want to set people straight because I was chasing ghosts for a long time as well . You're not setting anyone straight. The only 'ethnic' Jews are Khazars (aka Not Jews at all), the rest have simply adopted the culture and religion. The rest of your comment doesn't even make sense. There is a great future for this forum, if we maintain freedom of speech and mutual respect. And if we manage to stay serious, we can also get a flow of members from the two TFES forums. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2015 14:17:11 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/3802/threadThe NAZI's, starting in 1939, actively promoted the Religion known as Judaism/Jew, helping to morph it into a Race of People. NAZI NA = Nationalist Socialist Party ZI = Zionist Jew, those who believe through force, genocide and collusion, change can be manufactured within ISRAEL, allowing them to own and control their own Landmass. These Zionist Jews are the ones controlling the Top Corporations; Hollywood, Mass Media, NASA, the Military Industrial Complex, ect. Orthodox Jew = those who are waiting for their God to bring his Kingdom of Heaven down to Earth. These are the people who were sorted and murdered for political gain and profit. Jew is not a Race of People, it has always been a Religion. "Almost everything you've been taught, see or think you know is a Lie, Hoax or Fraud." Your alleged "NA-ZI" etymology is utter rubbish. I can't believe what amateurish research is presented here. justice4germans.com/2013/04/16/exposing-the-nazi-epithet-who-started-it-why-how-and-who-benefits/And the difference between Zionist and Orthodox Jews is only exterial in regards to the state of Israel question. Both, just like atheist Jews, see the Goyim as cattle to be jewed by them because they are chosen and Goyim only exist to serve them. Zionism vs Orthodoxy vs Communism merely argues about how to fleece the Goyim best. It's an internal Jewish debate how to best benefit their cause and achieve their goals, which are in turn all the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by efrohi on Apr 13, 2015 15:06:57 GMT
I just went to ifers with the link from acenci. I was banned but know i can read. The girl named lizardking is totaly aggresiv ... And others also ... Still the same there ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2015 16:40:54 GMT
Yes, IFERS won't change, because Eric won't likely change. He's in too deep, now. He put his own name on all of this, and to have to retract, would make him look silly with everything he's ever asserted. So he needs to keep calling everyone in the world a "shill".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2015 23:28:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Apr 17, 2015 23:28:26 GMT
They wonder why all the shills come here so quickly. Wonder if it occurs to them they gave me the link where the banned people go. And I was just on their forum because I was open to see discusion on this theory rather than me just watching videos. Showing interest isn't enough. Apparently you're a shill if you aren't converted and righteously banned. No matter that they send interested people to those very shills. I think it's an interesting study in social dynamics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2015 23:31:14 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/4060/threadDamn! You called that Acenci right; have you seen what he's trying to do to that forum he invaded? The only good existing thread on it was about rockets not working in a vacuum, but now Acenci, using the most obvious sock-puppet ever, a wikipedia-spouting entity called 'alive&kicking', is doing his best to subvert it & turn it to shit. Check it out, you won't believe how lame his act is... What a disgusting nasa-loving shill! That whole forum is full of disgusting NASA loving shills! It is a shill-forum made for and by shills! Every member that is banned here ends up there in less than ten hours ready to jump on the bandwagon. You should sign up (here) :) Yes, I see what you're referring to.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Apr 18, 2015 2:49:11 GMT
Haha, yep.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 10:33:00 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/4262/threadCaesar, the two people in the video are clearly different, so your video is doing nothing but propagating disinformation. Are you going to take the video down because it's complete non-sense or are you going to leave it up? I noticed that Caesar has taken down his weird Mark Sargent misinfo video claiming two clearly different people were the same. He originally refused to take it down but it appears he has come to his senses so I have invited him back to the forum. He puts out so much good stuff I highly doubt he's a "shill" but just made a mistake. I sent him the following message: Hey Caesar, I noticed you have taken down your Mark Sargent video, was that due to my recommendation? Did others tell you or did you figure out yourself that was not the same dude? Thanks for taking it down, you are now welcome back at IFERS (if you want, I understand if you don't, but please understand my position in weeding out misinfo, and whether you knew it or not, that video was misinfo.) Peace There you go, he's starting to change his racial policy, because he sees that his methods don't work and traffic has been decreasing. The new racial policy is that if you are a prolific YouTuber, you can disagree some of the time, and still not be labelled as a "shill" and be banned. And if you are a very famous one, like Mark Sargent, you can be labelled a full-fledged "shill" and still not be banned, as indeed Mark Sargent has not been banned from his forum. If instead you are unknown like us, the minute you disagree on something, you're banned and forever labelled as a "shill". Who cares if you have promoted his forum for a month, written hundreds of posts, and never said anything rude towards anyone. You get banned without even a warning by the thought police. Nice concept of justice, by Eric "Peace" Dubay. The more you are famous, the more you can get away with. The more you are unknown, the more he can crush you without a valid reason. Of course I hope caesar won't go back there.
|
|
|
|
Post by tinfoilhatgirl on Apr 18, 2015 10:45:30 GMT
Yeah I hope so, too.
People dont need a forum, a forum need the people if it is supposed to be forum.
Dubay needs the people because he wants the forum to be a multiplier to sell his book.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 11:41:35 GMT
Maybe, like you and Steven say (at minutes 25 and 55 of his Concave Earth session 2), he is "Eric Dubay-my book". However, in my opinion he seems to have other higher ideals. Yet he also seems to have lost track of his initial idealistic objectives: seeking and spreading the truth, "Peace" and certainly justice. The only remnant of justice in him is towards animals, by being a vegan. He is instead lacking justice towards humans. The members of this forum can witness it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 13:21:09 GMT
Bad news, the kissing up has worked: ifers.boards.net/post/4262/threadCaesar, the two people in the video are clearly different, so your video is doing nothing but propagating disinformation. Are you going to take the video down because it's complete non-sense or are you going to leave it up? I noticed that Caesar has taken down his weird Mark Sargent misinfo video claiming two clearly different people were the same. He originally refused to take it down but it appears he has come to his senses so I have invited him back to the forum. He puts out so much good stuff I highly doubt he's a "shill" but just made a mistake. I sent him the following message: Eric Dubay: Hey Caesar, I noticed you have taken down your Mark Sargent video, was that due to my recommendation? Did others tell you or did you figure out yourself that was not the same dude? Thanks for taking it down, you are now welcome back at IFERS (if you want, I understand if you don't, but please understand my position in weeding out misinfo, and whether you knew it or not, that video was misinfo.) Peace Caesar: hi eric, maybe I come back to ifers but I never subordinate to any group and their believes if others get banned. I always want to maintain distance and have my own opinion which can be argued..in case of the sargent video I changed my mind due to many good conversations and comments. anyways have a great day cya Eric Dubay: Glad to hear that, and I understand and appreciate your independence and non-subordinance. Hopefully you can appreciate my position/perspective in dealing with your clear (unintentional) misinfo video and your relentless defense of it. Now that you've taken it down, as I requested and recanted, however, I'm much more confident in your legitimacy and apologize if you'll accept it. Peace "I understand and appreciate your independence and non-subordinance": yeah, he appreciates your independence only as long as you are a big shot. If you are unknown, you will get banned for displaying any freedom of thought. Wait, but caesar said "I never subordinate to any group and their believes if others get banned", so maybe this means that Eric "Peace" Dubay will let back in all us unknown "shills" as well? I don't think so. Only famous YouTubers like Mark Sargent and caesar are allowed to stay there despite being called "shills". Everyone else gets banned for just disagreeing, even before being labeled a "shill". I have been accused of kissing up to everyone, and I defend myself by translating "kissing up" with "being nice", but there is one thing that cannot be defended: kissing up to the powerful, and mistreating the defenseless (especially when they are well-meaning fans, who helped you with your forum). And this is what the great leader Eric "Peace" Dubay does. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 13:36:34 GMT
More free advertising by Eric "I appreciate your independence" Dubay, who has noticed that lordstevenchrist has been able to speak freely 58 times here (a record that few people on his forum have broken except himself, and the few of us who were there in the first month of its life, when there was freedom of speech): ifers.boards.net/post/4265/threadI just checked over at Acenci's shill forum and now they've got "Lord" Steven "Christ" Con of the Cave over there shilling his concave Earth non-sense! He's already got 58 posts :) serendipitous.boards.net/user/31 That's cute that all the shills just get together and complain about the hardships of not being genuine human-beings :'( Poor them. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 15:27:00 GMT
George Harrison update: ifers.boards.net/post/4276/threadI just checked over at Acenci's shill forum and now they've got "Lord" Steven "Christ" Con of the Cave over there shilling his concave Earth non-sense! He's already got 58 posts :) serendipitous.boards.net/user/31 That's cute that all the shills just get together and complain about the hardships of not being genuine human-beings :'( Poor them. All that he has done by commenting there is prove beyond all doubt that he is nothing but a Shill. What an idiot. Or maybe lordstevenchrist just proved that he is a freethinker among freethinkers. Try to disagree with your leader and see what happens. If you didn't make any YouTube videos with lots of hits, you might get banned, too. If you are not a big YouTuber, once you allow some free thoughts in your posts, you will get banned, but, in case that happens, you know where to find us. Because we welcome all respectfully expressed points of view. But there, you can only disagree if you are big YouTuber. Speaking of which, Steven might get invited there, too, with all honors, just as Eric "Peace" Dubay did with caesar. "Peace" just with big YouTubers. Unknown members get kicked out for disagreeing, even if they are well-meaning fans. Speaking of which, our next three ideal members would be precisely well-meaning fans such as lizardking, thinkforyourself and schpankme. Just test your freedom of speech, and you will be banned. Disagree on anything, and you will be defamed as "shills". That is, provided you didn't make any YouTube videos with lots of views, which I think you didn't. The presently enforced IFERS-Nuremberg Laws require a combined total of 20,000 views to be able to disagree on 1 subject for a duration of one week. Only above 100,000 views, like Mark Sargent, you can permanently be a "shill" and still not be banned. At any rate, they should be made honorary members even before being banned from IFERS, for sending us all this traffic and all these members. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 16:30:21 GMT
Update from the lizard: ifers.boards.net/post/4294/threadI already said I wasn't going to bring it up over and over again. Hope you guys don't push too many real people away that might have otherwise stayed. Yeah you did say that, you also still refused to accept or even acknowledge the evidence you had been presented with, which I don't understand. So far there has not been a single member Eric has banned that has not turned out to be for the best. Of course "it turns out to be for the best", because it is a self-fulfilling prophecy: once you ban people, they feel a resentment for Eric that they did not feel before. You can't then identify that resentment as the cause of their banning, since it is just the consequence. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 16:44:23 GMT
Lizardking (an illuminati name if there ever was one) writes that, about those who were banned, it "turned out for the best".
LOL
So it "turned out for the best" and now it's walking through the prairie with flowers at your feet.
They need to get a grip. It's a message board. A message board. That's all it is. It isn't life. It isn't marriage and children. It's just a message board. People like lizardking need to seriously get a grip.
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Apr 18, 2015 17:04:46 GMT
Lizardking (an illuminati name if there ever was one) writes that, about those who were banned, it "turned out for the best". LOL So it "turned out for the best" and now it's walking through the prairie with flowers at your feet. They need to get a grip. It's a message board. A message board. That's all it is. It isn't life. It isn't marriage and children. It's just a message board. People like lizardking need to seriously get a grip. Great statement, @jess. Thank you. Have you noticed the fear that people have when posting a question that goes against the party line? Have you also noticed the aggression from the party when they don't seem to "get it"? They have to apologize for asking good questions. And sadly, the answers in the end are always the same repeated quotes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 17:10:53 GMT
Lizardking (an illuminati name if there ever was one) writes that, about those who were banned, it "turned out for the best". LOL So it "turned out for the best" and now it's walking through the prairie with flowers at your feet. They need to get a grip. It's a message board. A message board. That's all it is. It isn't life. It isn't marriage and children. It's just a message board. People like lizardking need to seriously get a grip. Great statement, @jess. Thank you. Have you noticed the fear that people have when posting a question that goes against the party line? Have you also noticed the aggression from the party when they don't seem to "get it"? They have to apologize for asking good questions. And sadly, the answers in the end are always the same repeated quotes. You are right. It is irony, really, as Eric presents himself as "fighting the new world order 24/7", and yet with a silly message board, he's training people to tow the party line, or else. That's part of the new world order, that you will fall in line, you will agree, you won't ask questions. And if you do, we will call you an enemy of the state ("shill") and you will be punished. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 17:21:37 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/4300/threadWow. I have just read Acenci's latest post about us, and I seem to have really flustered the poor old roach Queen. It was nice of the old dear to offer me, Lizarking and Schpankme a sanctuary on their forum, even if his offer was hilariously transparent. He knows that we are shitting all over them, and that is why he always tries to win us over with praise. Unfortunately for him, I find that his sucking up gives me shivers down my spine. What an absolutely desperate clown. If people who are going the wrong way have so much aversion for me and my ideas, I take it as a compliment. He is referring to this post: serendipitous.boards.net/post/1860/threadWe are still waiting for their expulsion and their arrival here, because precisely those who have been so mistaken... will be the best advocates for mutual respect and freedom of speech. I know, because I have been there, having been a "shill-hunter" myself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 17:27:15 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/4300/threadWow. I have just read Acenci's latest post about us, and I seem to have really flustered the poor old roach Queen. It was nice of the old dear to offer me, Lizarking and Schpankme a sanctuary on their forum, even if his offer was hilariously transparent. He knows that we are shitting all over them, and that is why he always tries to win us over with praise. Unfortunately for him, I find that his sucking up gives me shivers down my spine. What an absolutely desperate clown. If people who are going the wrong way have so much aversion for me and my ideas, I take it as a compliment. He is referring to this post: serendipitous.boards.net/post/1860/thread thinkforeric, I mean, thinkforyourself, can't break the Groupthink. Isn't he the one that loves George Harrison? George Harrison was another illuminati satanist (along with the rest of the Beatles) that sought to destroy and then build the new world order. These guys at IFERS are so obvious, they're telling you what they are. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 17:47:45 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/4304/threadYeah you did say that, you also still refused to accept or even acknowledge the evidence you had been presented with, which I don't understand. So far there has not been a single member Eric has banned that has not turned out to be for the best. I've already explained why I don't accept the perspective theroy (I, me, Myself) why I don't accept it. When I obsever things getting further from me they retain their shape but get smaller when they are further away eventually dissapearing into the horizon. The difference. When I see a setting a sun on an ocean I see the sun getting gobbled up from the bottom up. It is changing shape half way though it will be a half circle. If it was perspective I would see the entire ball the whole time but it would just be getting smaller. This is why I don't agree. Unless... it is some trick of the eye, some optical illusion that I don't know about, so I said hummmm... ok maybe it could be perspective so how do we prove this? Then I thought to myself ahhhh ha! lets zoom in on it while it was in the act of disappearing and if it comes back it would be perspective. But if it didn't then I (me, talking about me) would then not be convinced and I would have to think either its going under the horizon or even something really fantastic, going into the ocean. so I guess thats it, I don't believe something going into the distance will change shape, it'll just get smaller the further it gets and what I'm seeing is a full circle turning into a half circle. And I'll say again. Even if I saw the sun appearing to drop below the horizon (with my test) I still would not believe the main stream story. There is too much evidence showing they are wrong as we cannot measure the curvature after I thought about that I said ok, it could be flat it almost has to be because we can get any measurements of curvature so what are we left with. Possibly we have a flat earth that does have a sun and moon that orbits us. Look guys, there's going to be many people that are going to come to this site. I came because I finally watched an interview where Eric gave a shout out about it. You can't be biting peoples heads off because that are not at the exact same spot as you in their journeys. It going to turn people away, good people. anymore questions or side jabs you wanna throw my way lol.... I stress out that his last words after being tortured were in full agreement with us: Their daily visits are now less than half as when we were banned:  Lack of free speech and mutual respect is the cause in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by zero11s on Apr 18, 2015 17:48:37 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/4262/threadI noticed that Caesar has taken down his weird Mark Sargent misinfo video claiming two clearly different people were the same. He originally refused to take it down but it appears he has come to his senses so I have invited him back to the forum. He puts out so much good stuff I highly doubt he's a "shill" but just made a mistake. I sent him the following message: Hey Caesar, I noticed you have taken down your Mark Sargent video, was that due to my recommendation? Did others tell you or did you figure out yourself that was not the same dude? Thanks for taking it down, you are now welcome back at IFERS (if you want, I understand if you don't, but please understand my position in weeding out misinfo, and whether you knew it or not, that video was misinfo.) Peace There you go, he's starting to change his racial policy, because he sees that his methods don't work and traffic has been decreasing. The new racial policy is that if you are a prolific YouTuber, you can disagree some of the time, and still not be labelled as a "shill" and be banned. And if you are a very famous one, like Mark Sargent, you can be labelled a full-fledged "shill" and still not be banned, as indeed Mark Sargent has not been banned from his forum.  who cares? Don´t even try to get this creatures into a nice circle or you will be hit from the side that I can promise you! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 17:54:41 GMT
I am used to being hit from the side. I believe that, despite the recent disagreements, we are still about mutual respect and freedom of speech, so any "creature" should be able to join us as long as they express their views respectfully.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 17:56:51 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/4306/threadWow. I have just read Acenci's latest post about us, and I seem to have really flustered the poor old roach Queen. It was nice of the old dear to offer me, Lizarking and Schpankme a sanctuary on their forum, even if his offer was hilariously transparent. He knows that we are shitting all over them, and that is why he always tries to win us over with praise. Unfortunately for him, I find that his sucking up gives me shivers down my spine. What an absolutely desperate clown. It is nice to see Mother Roach finally showing her true colours; the embittered little nit is besides herself that a Youtube personality such as Caesar can be invited back onto the forum before Eric is dethroned and Queen Roach crowned Admin. Acenci masquerading as Jess is pretending he did not go through all five stages of grief simply because he was banned from a Message Board.
Yet again I am stunned by the comments made by these crippling losers, if there is indeed more than one. I cannot get my head around the idea that a self-admitted psycho can be paid to come up with this dog shit. Their forum makes embarrassingly transparent changes every week, each in a desperate attempt to somehow appeal to Eric and be made part of the "Nuremberg" again. Clearly Satan worshiping Jim Lizard King Morrison and George Hates God Harrison are really grating on you, but don't worry Acenci, we will still keep you in a job by banning all of the personalities you have to invent, and provide you with traffic that is "so high" you are considering advertising on this forum! And, besides, zero11s, stop disagreeing with me, since you are just one of the many personalities I invented (read above). Stop taking over my keyboard.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 18:11:32 GMT
You can see how lizardking changed his/her tune after me stating that a message board is not real life, and it's not a big deal. Now he/she wants to play the card that I somehow "grieved" at being thrown out of IFERS. So it went from, "it's for the best", to, "it's just a message board". Notice how easily I was able to change their view. They are Eric-led zombies. Just like that stupid first Star Wars movie, where Obi Wan Kenobi was able to talk to the storm trooper and get the storm trooper to change his view. "These aren't the droids we're looking for".  Lizardking and thinkforyourself are easily programmable storm troopers. Of course, I can't give away too much detail about all of this. After all, I'm just a paid shill, who is actually acenci. Wait until they find out that acenci is not a person. Acenci is a government-created auto-persona that infiltrates every conspiratorial topic with multiple programmable identities. You didn't hear me say, "delusional". I'm not supposed to use such words, right? But if I do, I can get myself (being acenci) to argue with myself (acenci) who doesn't like the word "delusional" being used on a message board. Oh, it's all so confusing. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 18:17:19 GMT
Yeah, tell me about it. I just spent 3 days arguing with myself, as moderator vs. the imaginary administrator personality I invented. Also, I could never get any of my other personalities to volunteer to pay for ads on their forum.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 18:25:36 GMT
Perfect guidelines on what we should try to avoid here: ifers.boards.net/post/4313/threadEric has explained that optical illusion many times and it is simple. If you had actually read any of his articles, you would know this: The Sun does not set, it simply moves away. When something moves away, perspective makes it seem as if it is sinking into the ground. For instance, if you see a woman walking into the distance, eventually it will seem like her legs are sinking into the pavement. The Sun only appears to change shape because of perspective, and because of the way that light reacts in the atmosphere. The greatest proof that the Sun does not set is the fact that in all footage and photographs, you can see the Sun hitting the the clouds from above. YET AGAIN you refuse to concede the fact that you were shown a video depicting exactly what you were asking for, what the fuck? My side jab is your absolute refusal to acknowledge the footage you have been shown, particularly of the Moon, and that you ignore every single comment which perfectly answers your questions. Read through the thread again, the debate is over. ok, sorry I'm stupid I guess :( I'll keep reading As usual, thanks, lizardking, for sending us more inquisitive freethinking members. Lately we don't have as much funding from Israel, due to having failed our mission (to infiltrate IFERS with critical thinking), but if things were to improve financially, we will send you a monthly transfer, based on number of the members you verbally abuse, and implicitly encourage to join us. |
|
who cares? Don´t even try to get this creatures into a nice circle or you will be hit from the side that I can promise you!