|
Post by TinfoilHatGirl on Apr 13, 2015 9:45:38 GMT
@ heathen:
I agree, that is how I understand it too. "Narrative" is just the word he uses for the golden thread of thoughts that he decided on before he started to produce his videos. And exactly this line of thought is missing in a lot of other peoples material on FET. Which explains why the Flat Earth Clues gained so much attention and good ratings.
If you want to introduce a new audience to a highly controversial topic most important thing is to first make up your mind on HOW you implement your most striking arguments. Most others just try to cramp as much details into just one video. And this is why they lose their audience on the way.
|
|
|
Post by lordstevenchrist on Apr 13, 2015 10:12:56 GMT
Just a last word to the Antichrist-Stevie issue: I couldnt care less who you let troll your forum. Just because IFERS goes down in shilloparanoia, doesnt mean you have to go to the other extreme on your new forum with over exaggerated tolerance towards people who have been proven trolls and shills and even stated so themselves. that's not very nice to call me a shill. i take it as an extreme insult. there is no reason to stay a flat earther when one is presented with the evidence. concaveearth.blogspot.com/2015/03/the-rectilineator.html
|
|
|
Post by lordstevenchrist on Apr 13, 2015 10:14:22 GMT
this video is over 1700 views in less than 24 hours. it's about Sargent and other pyops shills. people are waking up...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2015 10:42:15 GMT
Just a last word to the Antichrist-Stevie issue: I couldnt care less who you let troll your forum. Just because IFERS goes down in shilloparanoia, doesnt mean you have to go to the other extreme on your new forum with over exaggerated tolerance towards people who have been proven trolls and shills and even stated so themselves. that's not very nice to call me a shill. i take it as an extreme insult. there is no reason to stay a flat earther when one is presented with the evidence. concaveearth.blogspot.com/2015/03/the-rectilineator.htmlYes, tinfoilhatgirl, he is right. The reason we created this forum is that we also were called "shills", and even more Mark Sargent, so if we want to promote respect for him, we have to promote respect for everyone who has been accused of being a "shill" at one time or another. It's not like your favorite person becomes immune from suspicions and someone else's favorite person, just because he holds minority views, automatically gets voted as "shill" by a kangaroo court. Otherwise we'd be exactly like IFERS.
|
|
|
Post by jayjay on Apr 13, 2015 12:58:16 GMT
Couple things that bother me about Mark off the top of my head: He claims to have just wanted to get the idea into peoples heads. That's awesome. Most of his videos do a good job of that. But when he is asked about some more particular things, he makes pretty wild assumptions that make the listener believe that he has done the research to back it up when in fact he hasn't.
Byrd went to Antarctica and saw the wall? No, Byrd says he saw much more land and resources. How can you use this as proof of a dome? The moon, sun and stars are all projections? This is imagination based which is fine if you present it that way, but he says this as if he did the research and it's a fact. The Crow777 video of the distorted wave moving up the moon is interesting, but not conclusive enough to say everything is a projection. If there is more to this, I'm all ears.
Mark did a great job of scratching the surface and attracting new people to the possibility. I just don't like how he then wants to give the impression that he has some answers when he can just say "I haven't gotten that far into it to draw those conclusions."
|
|
|
Post by LIT on Apr 13, 2015 14:06:36 GMT
jayjayMark did a great job at fooling people. Most of his claims are made up. There was hardly any claim which wasn't modified by Mark to fit his theory. By the way, this guy Crow777 falls into the same category. People who make up stuff to gain publicity. Instead of watching his videos people should go out, get a telescope and look at the Moon. There is no wave! Mark should start admitting that he just wants to believe it is true but has no evidence. Of course, he won't get invited to radio shows anymore if he just said, well, I am guessing maybe the Earth is flat, because it sounds cool.
|
|
|
Post by Lion on Apr 13, 2015 14:29:32 GMT
Just a last word to the Antichrist-Stevie issue: I couldnt care less who you let troll your forum. Just because IFERS goes down in shilloparanoia, doesnt mean you have to go to the other extreme on your new forum with over exaggerated tolerance towards people who have been proven trolls and shills and even stated so themselves. I like you...
|
|
|
Post by Lion on Apr 13, 2015 14:36:20 GMT
Just a last word to the Antichrist-Stevie issue: I couldnt care less who you let troll your forum. Just because IFERS goes down in shilloparanoia, doesnt mean you have to go to the other extreme on your new forum with over exaggerated tolerance towards people who have been proven trolls and shills and even stated so themselves. that's not very nice to call me a shill. i take it as an extreme insult. there is no reason to stay a flat earther when one is presented with the evidence. concaveearth.blogspot.com/2015/03/the-rectilineator.htmlNumber one, you Steve, are not a shill. However, the rectilineator "experiment" has never been recreated because there was no need to. For example...IF the earth was concave as Cyrus Teed's theory states, then navigating an airplane would be impossible. That is just ONE problem. Also, acoustic levitation to keep the oceans in place around the INSIDE of a "GLOBE" (there's that globe word again), does not work to keep the water OFF the dry land, and if there are creatures living on the dry land surface, moving about freely. Concave earth and convex earth have the same water issues. PLEASE don't direct me or anyone to a video you did...express your answers here so that things can be made clear.
|
|
|
Post by Lion on Apr 13, 2015 14:41:34 GMT
Now, the "Mark Sargent" in the interviews simply cannot be the "Mark Sargent" that is writing the scripts for the videos. The script writer "Mark Sargent" is concise and has his storyline down pat, while the interview "Mark Sargent" is a bumbling mess. Hence why I believe that "Mark Sargent" is a operation.
|
|
|
Post by lordstevenchrist on Apr 13, 2015 15:10:17 GMT
Number one, you Steve, are not a shill. However, the rectilineator "experiment" has never been recreated because there was no need to. For example...IF the earth was concave as Cyrus Teed's theory states, then navigating an airplane would be impossible. That is just ONE problem. Also, acoustic levitation to keep the oceans in place around the INSIDE of a "GLOBE" (there's that globe word again), does not work to keep the water OFF the dry land, and if there are creatures living on the dry land surface, moving about freely. Concave earth and convex earth have the same water issues. PLEASE don't direct me or anyone to a video you did...express your answers here so that things can be made clear. no, the experiment was never re-conducted because of confirmation bias against earth concavity. airplanes navigate the way they do BECAUSE they are inside the earth, as the pressure gauges their altitude. Water is held at bay because of the pressurized system. It's very simple, you only THINK water is flat but when it is actually measured, it shows a dip. Joseph Winthrop has already busted flat earth with his laser experiments. They show the middle of the lake dipping below the starting and ending points. The Rectilineator does as well. You only THINK water levels are flat because the concave curvature is extremely minute within a short distance. You also deny how the heavens operate. I PROVED beyond a doubt flat earth is entirely untenable. Video in a few minutes.
|
|
|
Post by Lion on Apr 13, 2015 15:18:19 GMT
Number one, you Steve, are not a shill. However, the rectilineator "experiment" has never been recreated because there was no need to. For example...IF the earth was concave as Cyrus Teed's theory states, then navigating an airplane would be impossible. That is just ONE problem. Also, acoustic levitation to keep the oceans in place around the INSIDE of a "GLOBE" (there's that globe word again), does not work to keep the water OFF the dry land, and if there are creatures living on the dry land surface, moving about freely. Concave earth and convex earth have the same water issues. PLEASE don't direct me or anyone to a video you did...express your answers here so that things can be made clear. no, the experiment was never re-conducted because of confirmation bias against earth concavity. airplanes navigate the way they do BECAUSE they are inside the earth, as the pressure gauges their altitude. Water is held at bay because of the pressurized system. It's very simple, you only THINK water is flat but when it is actually measured, it shows a dip. Joseph Winthrop has already busted flat earth with his laser experiments. They show the middle of the lake dipping below the starting and ending points. The Rectilineator does as well. You only THINK water levels are flat because the concave curvature is extremely minute within a short distance. You also deny how the heavens operate. I PROVED beyond a doubt flat earth is entirely untenable. Video in a few minutes. OK, I would have to think that the oceans are FAR denser than all human life put together. You wrote, "Water is held at bay because of the pressurized system." The pressure required to hold the OCEANS, ALL THE OCEANS of the world IN PLACE and not coming onto the dry land, would absolutely prevent all dry land life. Dry Land Life would be crushed immediately...and even IF not crushed surely unable to move JUST LIKE THE OCEANS! But that is not the case in OBSERVABLE life. And please no videos. State your responses. Your videos always provide your "i am god" indoctrination material, in which no one is interested, and is not keeping with the topic of the thread Read more: serendipitous.boards.net/thread/20/mark-sargent?page=4#ixzz3XCcjGcFq
|
|
|
Post by lordstevenchrist on Apr 13, 2015 15:27:19 GMT
no, the experiment was never re-conducted because of confirmation bias against earth concavity. airplanes navigate the way they do BECAUSE they are inside the earth, as the pressure gauges their altitude. Water is held at bay because of the pressurized system. It's very simple, you only THINK water is flat but when it is actually measured, it shows a dip. Joseph Winthrop has already busted flat earth with his laser experiments. They show the middle of the lake dipping below the starting and ending points. The Rectilineator does as well. You only THINK water levels are flat because the concave curvature is extremely minute within a short distance. You also deny how the heavens operate. I PROVED beyond a doubt flat earth is entirely untenable. Video in a few minutes. Sorry you're have confirmation bias with my video, but most rational people can see how i destroy flat earth. Sorry also you have a hard time understanding that I am God in the flesh. Just as gravity is supposed to pull us down on a convex model, ether pushes us water and land down to their appropriate place within the concave wall of the earth. You will not get away with discrediting a perfect experiment in the rectilineator. You cannot and will not logically refute it or dismiss it without actually empirically re-conducting it. Since it was done with the utmost precision while convex skeptics looked on to make sure there were no problems or cheating, and also since an open invitation was made by the Koreshans for people to go do their own Rectilineator test, it stands as the prime standard experiment showing concavity. It has never been disproven or re-conducted for obvious reasons. I invite you to re-read the Wild Heretic's article on it. I challenge you to be objective and refrain from obvious emotional attachment toward a flat earth, and just look at the cold hard facts. www.wildheretic.com/concave-earth-theory/
|
|
|
Post by jayjay on Apr 13, 2015 15:32:49 GMT
LIT You seem to be preaching ignorance when most of us are here because we are not ignorant. If we ignore all of the information these guys are giving then you have no information to evaluate. You may as well close your eyes and live in the world the establishment built for you in bliss. Sometimes I wish I could do that, but I am awake and can't fall back to sleep. I know you have that globe in your head and won't let go. That's fine, there is mounds of evidence to support that. But I'm telling you, they are hiding something with all of this. The truth has not been revealed. And we're here trying to make some sense of it all. Do you agree?
Sometimes I read your posts and think you believe the science books. And other times I think you know something is wrong. I know me and you both agree that it appears exploration of Antarctica is the logical next step in order to find some truth.
|
|
|
Post by Lion on Apr 13, 2015 15:35:44 GMT
In looking at the FACTS, (not theory...as even gravity has never been proven and is another theory up there on the shelf with numerous others), and OBSERVABLE life, the THEORY of the Earth being concave does not work. Sorry. That's out. But that doesn't mean we should stop thinking and exploring plausible ideas. But to continue spending time on something that has too many "this does not work" issues, don't make sense.
And the actor known as "Mark Sargent" claims we are under a dome and we are not
|
|
|
Post by LIT on Apr 13, 2015 16:00:17 GMT
LIT You seem to be preaching ignorance when most of us are here because we are not ignorant. If we ignore all of the information these guys are giving then you have no information to evaluate. You may as well close your eyes and live in the world the establishment built for you in bliss. Sometimes I wish I could do that, but I am awake and can't fall back to sleep. I know you have that globe in your head and won't let go. That's fine, there is mounds of evidence to support that. But I'm telling you, they are hiding something with all of this. The truth has not been revealed. And we're here trying to make some sense of it all. Do you agree? Sometimes I read your posts and think you believe the science books. And other times I think you know something is wrong. I know me and you both agree that it appears exploration of Antarctica is the logical next step in order to find some truth. jayjayWhen did I preach ignorance? Just the opposite. Could you be more specific please, because I don't know what to address now. Sometimes things are suspicious, but not always.
|
|
|
Post by jayjay on Apr 13, 2015 16:36:27 GMT
LIT "Instead of watching his videos people should go out, get a telescope and look at the Moon. There is no wave!"
Getting a telescope and looking at the moon is not what this guy does. He points a camera at it for hours on end. That's what you would need to do in order to recreate his experiment. I felt that was ignorant. I apologize. I take the ignorant preaching part back. You do promote thought and I didn't think that statement through before I hit send. I appreciate your insight on everything. I have explored many different avenues due to your message board and your research. Hope you don't hold it against me.
|
|
|
Post by Lion on Apr 13, 2015 16:48:44 GMT
LIT "Instead of watching his videos people should go out, get a telescope and look at the Moon. There is no wave!" Getting a telescope and looking at the moon is not what this guy does. He points a camera at it for hours on end. That's what you would need to do in order to recreate his experiment. I felt that was ignorant. I apologize. I take the ignorant preaching part back. You do promote thought and I didn't think that statement through before I hit send. I appreciate your insight on everything. I have explored many different avenues due to your message board and your research. Hope you don't hold it against me. How is this about Mark Sargent?
|
|
|
Post by jayjay on Apr 13, 2015 16:51:15 GMT
Mark Sargent promotes the Moon Wave Video, and we spun a little off topic.
|
|
|
Post by Lion on Apr 13, 2015 17:03:18 GMT
Mark Sargent promotes the Moon Wave Video, and we spun a little off topic. Oh ok...yeah the crow "777" moon wave. The thing that instantly smacks me in the face about crrow is that it is common knowledge that a great majority of fakers on YouTube identify themselves with the "777". So take that for what it is worth.
|
|
|
Post by LIT on Apr 13, 2015 17:08:19 GMT
LIT "Instead of watching his videos people should go out, get a telescope and look at the Moon. There is no wave!" Getting a telescope and looking at the moon is not what this guy does. He points a camera at it for hours on end. That's what you would need to do in order to recreate his experiment. I felt that was ignorant. I apologize. I take the ignorant preaching part back. You do promote thought and I didn't think that statement through before I hit send. I appreciate your insight on everything. I have explored many different avenues due to your message board and your research. Hope you don't hold it against me. I find it hard to believe that he is the only one who ever pointed a camera at the Moon for hours on end. However, as far as I know the wave has been recorded only by him. That is suspicious. When Mark endorses videos like that as evidence, he is basically promoting gullibility. You can't just believe whatever someone on youtube posted. It might sound fascinating, but that is not a good reason to believe it is true. Mark has many similar ideas which are not backed up by any facts. In fact, he mixes some truth with lies. He talks about admiral Byrd, for instance, then he mentions that Byrd discovered the dome. How is this not deceptive?
|
|
|
Post by jayjay on Apr 13, 2015 18:33:47 GMT
He is not the only one who points his camera at the moon. A lot of youtube videos of the moon doing weird stuff. Found this one in 3 minutes.
You can't just believe whatever someone posts on youtube. But are you suggesting don't look? Someone might find it fascinating enough to do it themselves and find something. Of course they'll never convince you. Did you analyze the video to prove a fake? Or are you just going with a "He's the only one to record it so you can't trust him" approach?
I agree he mixes truth with lies. They all do. Some on purpose, others not so much.
|
|
|
Post by LIT on Apr 13, 2015 19:39:31 GMT
He is not the only one who points his camera at the moon. A lot of youtube videos of the moon doing weird stuff. Found this one in 3 minutes. You can't just believe whatever someone posts on youtube. But are you suggesting don't look? Someone might find it fascinating enough to do it themselves and find something. Of course they'll never convince you. Did you analyze the video to prove a fake? Or are you just going with a "He's the only one to record it so you can't trust him" approach? I agree he mixes truth with lies. They all do. Some on purpose, others not so much. jayjayI am not suggesting you shouldn't look at youtube videos. I am just saying that if it is sensational the chances are it is fake. Of course you can't trust him. I am surprised how suspicious people are of everyone else but the guys who post stuff on youtube and some random people on forums. Why do you think it makes more sense to distrust people who professionally do something and trust those who do it for fun in their free time?
|
|
|
Post by TinfoilHatGirl on Apr 13, 2015 20:58:39 GMT
LIT, you are wrong.
The Lunar Wave has been captured 12 times and this was done by a number of different people across the world, NOT only by Crrow777 alone. I dont remember how many it were exactly but I have something like 5 or 6 different people who filmed it on my mind, not sure. But for sure more than just one person. Crrow777 was only the first on youtube to point the public to this strange phenomena.
|
|
|
Post by LIT on Apr 13, 2015 22:01:44 GMT
LIT, you are wrong. The Lunar Wave has been captured 12 times and this was done by a number of different people across the world, NOT only by Crrow777 alone. I dont remember how many it were exactly but I have something like 5 or 6 different people who filmed it on my mind, not sure. But for sure more than just one person. Crrow777 was only the first on youtube to point the public to this strange phenomena. Okay, I guess I was wrong then. How do you know this anyway? Honestly, I never studied Crow777's videos. It just seems fishy. Am I not allowed to suspect someone of making stuff up? Not to mention that the so-called wave looks like a software glitch or a camera thing. I am sure no one saw it with their eyes, and not on video. That should tell you something. It is like believing in ghosts because someone recorded one on video, but no one saw it in the room. Also, why don't you join? Are you going to always participate in the discussions as a guest? I find this strange. It almost suggests that you don't like this forum.
|
|
|
Post by Lion on Apr 13, 2015 22:06:41 GMT
yeah, TinFoilHatGirl, register already
|
|
|
Post by jayjay on Apr 13, 2015 22:10:04 GMT
I think you know I don't support blind trust, professional or amateur. I'm just saying that you can't just say it's false because it seems fishy. That to me says it deserves a closer look before you can throw it in the trash. I don't see it as a software glitch because he panned up away and it caught up after the pan. If it is a fake it was done intentionally and should be provably false.
|
|
|
Post by jayjay on Apr 13, 2015 22:16:22 GMT
Also I appreciate Tinfoilhatgirl's input, whether she's registered or not. I don't see anything to suggest she is being disingenuous. I understand it bothers some of you guys.
|
|
|
Post by TinfoilHatGirl on Apr 13, 2015 23:25:22 GMT
@lit: Why so offended?
You said "However, as far as I know the wave has been recorded only by him. That is suspicious."
A simple statement that is not correct and I corrected it with the facts I know. How can I know? Because I am a follower of Crrows channel for about a year or so and I am very interested in the Lunar Wave phenomenon. And nowhere did I attack you in my post that you must believe in the Lunar Wave. You are free to believe it is a camera glitch or whatever, I dont care?! I just wanted to mention there is more to it than only Crrow insisting the wave exists. Others have filmed it too which gives quite some more weight to Crrows claims. So others have filmed it too however too few to say it is a phenomenon that anyone can easily catch who has a telescope and points it towards the moon. Why has no one seen it without telescope? Well because you need the telescope to see it as it is very sudden and vague and you need the magnification of the scope to detect it. No one has seen Earth from above either. But we make our theories about what Earth actually looks like is it flat does it have a dome or not ....Croww also states what he thinks is going on based on the research he and others have done so far. Nothing else.
And apart from that I dont know if I will be interested in the FET for too long, this means discussing it. Well yes, I came to the conclusion you all have valid points and the Earth is most probably flat. I have been deceived, but okay, now I know and my life will go on I guess. What else? Stagnation. There wont be anything for us to do than to argue over and over about the details of the Flat Earth construct. Some experiments have already been made to prove the FET. Not by us however. But I guess none of us will have the means or the possibility or even the permission to prove anything by ourselves anytime soon if ever in our lifetime. None of us is a scientist to think of something completely new to prove FET. So I might move on from this topic after having accepted it (as the details dont change the general problem which is the overall deception matrix we live in and is forced upon us by those who are more mighty than we little folks)....and wait for something big to happen that might be a game changer (which could also come by Croww - who knows!) Because it helps nothing to know the Earth is flat if the Elites are faster with implementing NWO, Agenda 21 and other horrific threats than we are with coming to terms on how to unveil the deception to the masses. And even if we managed to get the masses to be interested into FET, the Elites will go into panic mode and hurry up with their destruction of humanity and we will all have to face closer problems which is survival. Doesnt matter if Earth is flat or spherical if the Elites are plotting to kill off the majority of mankind which is also a fact that I have come to accept for myself.
-inappropriate content removed-
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2015 23:51:29 GMT
deleted as this is a board of mutual respect and tolerance, personal attacks on helpless board members are not appropriate
|
|
|
Post by lordstevenchrist on Apr 13, 2015 23:53:32 GMT
i think i'll stop posting, i don't need this.
|
|