Is Antarctica the ice wall around the flat disc?

Anything is ultimately hearsay from some source.  Since we cannot go there ourselves.  But reading sailor's and explorer's journals from over the last 150 years or so, using those resources, they all agree that something weird is going on with Antarctica.   That, they try to "circle" it, and it just seems to go on and on and on.  Matt Boylan also said that this is the information he is given.  Again, hearsay, but still something to go on.

So I am convinced that it is a circle around the flat earth.  For these reasons, and also because, I haven't seen any convincing research to make me think otherwise. 

I am convinced that Matt Boylan is legit.  The first reason being, if the flat earth was just part of his act, it would be a terrible choice, a real act killer.  Because being a flat earther isn't exactly the way to get a crowd of thousands into a stadium for your act. 

I am also always skeptical of anything that comes out of the "history pages" or the media.  I've learned to be skeptical about everything.  So I don't buy the Scott or other expeditions.  Once I saw that the government and NASA and tons of other agencies are making things up out of thin air, then everything has to be brought into question.

But the organized tours aren't going to take you beyond just a little area.  I don't have the feasibility to actually travel there myself, so I need to rely on other forms of research.  Factor in the claims that many make, that you will be shot on sight by world government agents if you go too far into Antarctica.  Then there is the issue that explorer's journals always said that the waters were so volatile traveling down there, and their journeys always took much longer than they should have.  There's something bizarre about the whole thing.

Even that we call it "Antarctica" is just a product of the world's programming.  In reality, what if it's just an earth-surrounding mountain range so far from direct sunlight, that it is covered in ice, and the name "Antarctica" really doesn't fit the reality of an earth-surrounding mountain range.

That is exactly what I'm saying.  People have always written books since the creation of man.  People write books, so do I believe the books of people 150 years ago, or the books of the people in the last 50 years?  Maybe both are wrong.  Which is why we can't come to any definitive conclusions.

There is one other issue here that I haven't mentioned yet, and that is the Bible.  I do personally believe the Bible is the absolute Word of God, and is 100% true.  So that is my final authority on all matters.  So that's really the only text I'm going to go with 100% of the time.  Everything else is subject to scrutiny, for me.

I've seen Zhib's map, but it doesn't work with the flight paths and times.  It doesn't work with any of the flights that go from NH to NH.  And it doesn't explain the SH flights always going through the NH, nor does it explain the secret refueling stops that Zetetic Flat Earth exposed in one of his videos.  So while Zhib might mean well, it just doesn't work. 

I never said that the Bible was stating anything about an ice wall.  I was just bringing it up as a point of reference, that other than the Bible, I don't trust any materials without tons and tons of scrutiny.

The passengers and pilots aren't lying.  They're flying by GPS.  All they know is that the plane is going where GPS says to go.

Zhib's map is impossible.  And I don't trust the UN for anything.  It is the UN, after all.  I don't believe that the UN map is perfect.  I don't believe there is any perfect map of the flat earth.  At least, nothing that would be accessible to people like you and me.

Zhib's map is impossible, because it turns the flight times from one NH place to another NH place, into impossibility.  The flight times would be absolutely impossible.  They don't do secret refuel stops on those flights.  They do on the SH to SH flights, if it is a non-stop flight (and these are very difficult to find anyway). 

His map is impossible on the flight time issue alone.

The north-pole-based position, is not impossible for the outer ring flights.  They all connect in the northern hemisphere, unless you find one of the few direct flights, and those do stops to refuel. 

lol I don´t even trust official flight times

yes I am not a brainstormer but a simple delay, weather circumstances, terrorism, or whatever are just very good reasons for everything this way

Yes, supposedly planes fly across the Arctic all the time. I have an idea. What if the ice rim is composed both of Antarctica and the Arctic. We just need to redraw the map. It would be similar to the regular map, but we need to make some adjustments. There should be an ocean between Asia and North America

jayjay
Actually, the Southern hemisphere flights are not that abnormally long. It is only Mark who makes up fake facts that it takes 20 hours to fly from Australia to South America. It takes only twelve. There are flights with connections, but if you see how long each leg takes you will see it matches perfectly with the known distances. On the other hand, the southern hemisphere flights should be much, much longer assuming the FE map is correct. If you look at the flat Earth map again, the flight routes are impossible(i.e. super long). Remember the equator has a circumference of 40,075 km and it is a circle around the North Pole. That is why Mark made up the whole thing about the radar disappearing flights, and the missing non-stop flights and the very long flights. It doesn't matter if most flights have connections if there are still non-stop flights which take 12 hours from Santiago to Sydney. His argument is a joke. The same philosophy as the confused girl who suggested that Patagonia should have midnight Sun. These people are either ignorant(as in intentionally avoiding to learn something) or liars. I feel personally offended that someone wants me to believe in nonsense and insists it is true. That is nothing else but disinfo. I did my research and found absolutely nothing weird about the flight times in the southern hemisphere. Those who say there is something wrong have never looked at a globe and never studied carefully the flat Earth map which is bullshit. Zhib's map is not correct either. It is a south pole projection map. Using his map it takes shorter to fly to the South pole than to Alaska from Europe. Antarctica is halfway and crossing Russia takes forever. He also denies that people fly in the Arctic all the time. Both maps are distortions by definition. It is wrong to say one is the flat Earth map and the other is Zhib's map, because no one drew those maps for that purpose at all. They are map projections and have proper names. North Pole Azimuthal equidistant projection and South Pole Azimuthal equidistant projection. Everyone knows that a map projection is based on a sphere and it is always distorted. Claiming it is true and correct is meaningless.

jayjay All maps in existence are map projections based on the distances on a sphere. They are distorted. This is the definition of a map projection. The only possibility for anything in the current model to be wrong would be if the distances are fake.How do you fake distances? The airlines spend more fuel just to keep the conspiracy going? They also fly two-three times faster in the southern hemisphere to compensate for the longer distances? The compass is wrong, the latitude and longitude are wrong. The sunset and sunrise times are wrong? Does it sound reasonable to you? You can fly to anywhere using flight connections.There are many options to reach your destination. It will be strange if there are no non-stop flights, but there are. If you want to go to Florida you can also go first to London, it is your choice. You can also fly directly though. What are you suggesting? Just to give you an example how stupid this thing with the flight connections is. They say it is strange why you cannot fly from Buenos Aires to Sydney directly. However, you can fly from Buenos Aires to Santiago for less than 2 hours and from there you take another flight to Sydney for 12 hours. What exactly is suspicious here? Please tell me?

Yes, indeed.  There is a reason that NASA are creators of cartoons.  NASA makes more cartoons than Nickelodeon.

They are lying about virtually everything.  So the fact that something is being covered up, is evident.  I don't believe it's just cartoons to keep the funding coming, as in, "we're doing so much research, so gimme the money".  I believe they are truly hiding giant things.  And I believe the flat earth is one of them.

Well that's a new one.  Is he saying that there is an infinite loop west and east, and ice "mountains" block north and south?