Video from 143km above shows FLAT earth. And comes from NASA

honesttruthseeker
I understand that NASA and its missions seem fake, but could you please explain why they would want to show the Earth flat from space and for what purpose? If the missions are fake they can make it appear whatever they want. We can't use NASA footage if we consider them a fake space agency. So they are fake, but then we use their own photos and videos to prove the Earth is flat? Do you see the contradiction?

You think NASA sends rockets into space but lies about the shape of the Earth and somehow it accidentally leaked a video where there is no curvature thus proving the Earth is flat? Why would they do that if they are trying to hide the real shape of the Earth? Apparently, they are either not hiding anything or they are trying to make people believe the Earth is flat. This kind of logic doesn't make sense to me. Maybe the lack of curvature doesn't prove flat Earth?

Acenci, seriously. Don't you think it is retarded if you want to hide something from the masses to give them a video which shows there is no curvature? That is not playing devil's advocate, that is common sense. If someone is hiding something and they control the access to this kind of information they surely will not show you footage from space which helps the flat Earth theory. Apparently, the video was shot and no one cared if someone out there would think it is evidence for flat Earth, because they don't consider the lack of curvature in photos to be evidence for that.

LIT, if I may ask a question.... do you think that perhaps the earth is not flat after all?  The reason I'm asking is that you seem to be saying several thing in several threads, that look to me that you are unconvinced.  Not just unconvinced about the nature of the map.  But unconvinced that the earth is flat at all.

If this is not so, and I'm wrong, please do forgive me.

But you did make a comment in another thread, about Eric Dubay and Mark Sargent maybe both just being psy-op agents to test how gullible people could be with the "earth is flat" stuff when the earth is obviously a ball.

So I just wanted to ask this.  Again forgive me please if I am way off.

Because of the curvature formula. That is my watertight argument. If you are not convinced by that, you might as well join fakeologist and say that JFK was not assassinated -- all due respect to his theory, but then we don't even know if our parents are really our parents and what is my name, and why should I use my five senses.

Sorry to have disrupted your exchange, but I think I am not off-topic for once.

By the way, I plan to involve as many members as possible in making a YouTube film together, maybe on the curvature formula or on any other watertight proofs they have of flat earth:
serendipitous.boards.net/thread/83/youtube-video

Why do they add less provable information?
They want to be stars. The curvature formula + lighthouses data (ranges and heights) amounts to just 2 Wikipedia links, and you won't become a star because of providing those two links.

By the way, it is all here:
serendipitous.boards.net/thread/11/curvature-formula

I had some thoughts on this I wanted to put out there.  Being on this forum has caused me to see things in a different way, I think.

Here is a quote I saw in a movie recently:
“Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But, if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And, if it is round, will the King's command flatten it?” St. Thomas More (1500’s England)

Perhaps they were debating this question back then as well?

When I first heard about the FE theory, I found it fascinating. I had learned about and solidly accepted the Geocentric Theory as being true over a year ago because of a film that had been released, “The Principle”. I thought it completely turned physics and astronomy on its head and at the same time, appreciated how it harmonized with my faith - strengthened it. There were many passages in the Bible that finally made better sense to me.  But the more I learned about the Copernican principle and the Galileo affair, and after reading an online book called, “Earth Movers”, I also became more convinced that there was something far more sinister behind all this.

So when I came across Flat Earth Theory, I was already prepared with the basics of a stationary earth, but was dumbfounded at the concept of the earth being flat. But I was very open, nonetheless. But the more I read, listened and observed others who promoted this theory, something else happened. I saw more and more people - experts, if you will - who had contempt for Jesus Christ, either despising Him or reducing Him to some mere “figure” or “myth”. The last forum I was on seemed to be loaded with this kind of dark, oppressive spirit, whether in the “religious” context, or the crude language or the aggressive attitudes they portrayed to those who disagreed with the “party line” so-to-speak. And there really is a “party line” no matter what they try to convince you of.

I want to be clear, I am not trying to push a viewpoint on those who do not agree with my religious point of view, and I certainly do not intend to offend anyone, so if my language is not what I am hoping it is, please tell me!

But I found it harder to believe that people who displayed these negative and aggressive traits could be sincerely interested in the truth or even have the truth. There was a sincerity or perhaps a humility lacking there for the truth to even plant itself. I found it becoming an obstacle to accepting the FE theory because of the lack of humility and charity I found with those promoting it. I also found a very deep paranoia running throughout and what seemed to be a contempt for all authority everywhere.  It almost seemed that the earth was flat "because of what was being hid from us", rather than "these very strong points and experiments point to this truth about the earth."  The conspiracy element seemed to overwhelm the "proofs" I guess. I don't find that here. I find a very healthy lively skepticism which I think is necessary to "prove" a theory.

Even though here there are divergent “world views” if you will, there is a sincerity and respect and civility that is what is best in our humanity. There are no experts here, but average people who are trying to find the truth about this. What do we have to lose? Nothing really. I would rather believe in the truth, even if it disappointed my current idea, rather than believe in and promote a lie.

I am still quite open to FE theory, but am happy that we are also working hard to test and try the theory to find holes in it. I think there are points about it that still hold my attention, while other points seem to be lesser arguments, or sometimes actually work contrary to the believability of the theory.

Wise words, matt and honesttruthseeker.

Speaking of the curvature formula, I had started a thread wondering if we could all collaborate on a YouTube flat earth video together, to build some ties and strengthen the community through a binding experience:
serendipitous.boards.net/thread/83/youtube-video

The only person who replied to me about it is tetstruthtube, who makes videos on a regular basis and has told me he will help us with the editing and soundtracks. If no one else will join the joint effort, I will start working precisely on what I've always considered my personal watertight proof that the earth is flat, that is the curvature formula and its discrepancy with videos and pictures of the horizon.

At the bottom of the video we will place a link (besides to all resources used) to this forum, so to increase the membership and avoid the risk of extinction.

I will now go on that thread and start gathering materials and ideas to use in the video.