New Videos from Math Powerland and The Nasa Channel

While Matt Boylan is correct about the earth being flat, he is way wrong about there being OTHER populated land masses "across the ice". See, the globe model's intent is to crush humanity spiritually. The intent is to make man insignificant, living on an insignificant "planet" in an insignificant "solar system" in an insignificant "galaxy", in an ever expanding universe...and of course no REAL and Personal God. So, WHAT does Matt do??? He takes the globe model's intent and applies it to a Flat Earth, with the same spiritually crushing elements. And then all the "alien" nonsense gets added only in this paradigm. Just HOGWASH!

"And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good." Genesis 1:9-10.

God called the DRY LAND Earth. The waters were gathered unto one place and let the dry land appear.

Here...HERE is what the Satan-worshipping maniacs in power are hiding by command. THIS is what they do not want you to know is coming. READ the words carefully. ALL the deception will be taken out of the way:

""And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood; And the stars of heaven FELL unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind. And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places. And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains; And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?" Revelation 6:12-17

Well said, Lion. 

It was Matt (Math Powerland) Boylan that was used to wake me up to the possibility of the flat earth.  I do believe him, in terms of his NASA history and experiences.  But he is way off in terms of spiritual matters, and you are right, he is playing into the same hand that the ball earthers are playing into, that is, degrade people.

I don't think he's doing it on purpose, but it is a possible result of him not believing the Bible.

At any rate, I did enjoy his videos, and I'm glad he's making them again.  It had been about a couple months.

He does quote the Bible at times, but yeah, he doesn't believe it as the final authority.  He does occasionally communicate with jhenningkellogia, who is a Bible believer.

Yep, that is bothering me too.  I hope he's just doing it out of unknowing imagination (the artist thing).  Because it brings him into doubt.  He's been very helpful to me in getting this far, but like some of the other arenas of conspiracy, a certain person can only bring you so far until you have to move on to the next, so to speak.

I have to disagree with you on your theory about Matt. If you are to believe his nasa story that woke him up, then he was told by those in the know that there is no end to Antarctica. It keeps going forever. He may have been told of other sun systems or he may have just come up with that theory from his experience. I don't remember him ever saying that he was told that. But the "elite" that opened his eyes probably didn't mention the bible while explaining the matter.
(In my opinion: you don't need to have his idea or a ball idea in order to degrade people. You can step back at humanity as a whole and see that we are just as dumb as we are smart. We hate just as much as we love. And I don't do see how ridiculous it is to not use the bible in explaining your work when many things in the bible are incredibly unbelievable. This would be why many people use the bible as a spiritual guide rather than a text of reliable facts.)
The skeptic can use your unquestioning belief in the bible against you. The bible can be used to your advantage as well. I don't recommend you stop using it. I personally think henning does great work using both scientific reasoning and the bible. Haven't watched all his videos but flat earth 2013 is one of my favorites.
As far as money grubbing goes. It is a catch 22. If you seek money you're researching out of greed. But you need money to live and if you don't seek it in your research you will have less time to do it as you will need to work elsewhere to get your money. I find it a very slippery slope. It is a fact that if we are to ever find the truth, we will need money, power, and and reliable leadership. Matt appears to be seeking all 3. I lean towards him as genuine. If I had that artistic talent I don't believe I would be pitching flat earth for a monetary angle. I would be just fine selling my art and painting hot naked babes without the majority thinking I am a lunatic.

So, are we seeing his face at 1:44?



No, wait, wrong. He looks different on Facebook: www.facebook.com/jimmy.henning.14

I, too, think that Matt is genuine. Let's also remember about his "accident" (assassination attempt or warning):



You either argue it is fake, or you must believe that he is genuine.

Yeah, that's why we are forgiving all these "real deals" for being so unbalanced (cf. our IFERS experience). And that's why we suspect the mentally balanced ones of being "shills" (cf. suspicions towards Mark Sargent).

Yes, I agree. Let us all respect one another, regardless of our opinions. The rule should be mutual respect rather than agreeing with one another. We should only agree on mutual respect.

As I said before, I think we should be ready to welcome respectful historical revisionists, agnostics, atheists, etcetera (some have already joined us by the way). This would be a real test to our freedom of speech. I hope everyone agrees (again, I am not the administrator).

So yes, unnecessary arguments will be avoided more effectively if we do not use any negative connotation in defining their points of view.

@jess, if you agree on this, probably Guest will feel ok about joining us. He's probably waiting to be reassured that we will allow his freedom of speech and respect his point of view, without belittling it in any way.