Post by LIT on Nov 2, 2015 22:21:39 GMT
Yeah, I agree the guy is really sharp. It is clear he is very intelligent and eloquent. It also seems that he is always very well prepared or at least he reads from what he has prepared in advance. As for Mark, it is not fair, in my opinion, to do what Mark Sargent does. Mentioning dome builders when it is well known that God created the firmament is just misleading. Why would you mention some other creatures when we already know that the Earth was created? What exactly is the originality in this? That instead of talking about God he talks about "them"? I don't like it. Seriously! We don't need to do this, it is pointless. We just need to confirm whether or not it's flat.
It seems it is not a globe. I feel it's a hoax now. Just don't know how it can be proven for a fact. All the issues with space travel, ISS hoax etc. make me believe in anything but the official story. I don't know why I should trust science for something so fundamental as the shape of the Earth, if they lie about so much other stuff. It is hard to tell where the lies end, so I am just cautious and skeptical. However, till people organize and do their own experiments we're pretty much lunatic rebels. Philosophically speaking it all adds up, but it's not enough to be 100% sure.
It seems it is not a globe. I feel it's a hoax now. Just don't know how it can be proven for a fact. All the issues with space travel, ISS hoax etc. make me believe in anything but the official story. I don't know why I should trust science for something so fundamental as the shape of the Earth, if they lie about so much other stuff. It is hard to tell where the lies end, so I am just cautious and skeptical. However, till people organize and do their own experiments we're pretty much lunatic rebels. Philosophically speaking it all adds up, but it's not enough to be 100% sure.