Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2015 16:16:46 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2015 14:44:25 GMT
OK, as expected UNreal has been banned. Two days ago I asked gioknows if he could invite UNreal to join us, "once he will be banned", because he was likely to be banned soon and I was pretty correct in my assessment of the situation, given that he was not agreeing with them on 911. It happened 24 hours later: ifers.boards.net/post/2392/threadhello Admin, • i seem to have been banned from this forum, which i find sad, especially if it is a decision that has been made consciously. • we all like to live in a free and open society, and even more-so when we set out to uncover truth, the control-structure we live under and it's hidden agenda. • to proceed to any sort of judgement and/or exclusion without taking the time to openly inform or discuss on the matter at hand seems against the values true research would embrace. diverging opinions is expected when individuals strive to establish their world view. i fully admit i'm often mistaken. when debate is engaged in an open, polite and explicit manner this can actually have the merit to contribute to developing a wider understanding of any subject at hand. these were/are my principles for participating and subscribing to this forum, as it has/is the case for the other forms i follow or discuss on. • wish you luck with your website and would like to thank the members i had the pleasure to debate and converse with. • UNreal Wow, this is a gentleman, and definitely has a lot of self-control and style. More on fakeologist.com: fakeologist.com/2015/04/01/unreal-works-hard-gets-banned/I am noticing how none of these people take it personally. Very striking difference compared to our own behavior here. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2015 0:00:10 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2015 17:36:33 GMT
Fakeologist voice chat, with Ab and Unreal (he has posted on our forum): fakeologist.com/2015/04/07/audiochat-april-6-2015/min. 6 They start talking about flat earth. They are very diplomatic, but they are implying that IFERS is a little bit too aggressive. min. 8 UNreal is implying that Mark Sargent might be a shill, due to the hat he wears. min. 11 Criticism of Mark Sargent starts and goes on for a few minutes ("dome" talk, religious talk, etc.). min. 13 Ab seems the least prone of the two to thinking that Mark is a shill. UNreal thinks it is not worth listening to Mark's interviews anymore, because he feels Mark does not bring enough proofs. I feel the same about this, but not enough to stop listening, also because he keeps bringing personal information, that makes me assess better if he is a shill or not. min. 16 They stop talking about flat earth. They are talking about the Titanic and Ab says he doesn't think it sank. I disagree. min. 20 talking about the South Pole, but only briefly min. 29 on AIDS - fakeologist (AB) doubts the main scientists explaining AIDS. What he says goes in favor of the hypothesis that he's not a shill. Although I have all my other doubts regarding the fact that he says JFK was an actor and other alleged media fakery. min. 31 on DNA min. 32 Ab gives his definition of "mind control": not drugs, but encouraging the masses to conform to the... "pensée unique": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pens%C3%A9e_uniquemin. 37 They talk about princess Diana. I am surprised Ab is not saying that she was an actress. What is the evidence that JFK was an actor that is more compelling than Diana being an actress? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 7:44:32 GMT
fakeologist, thanks for joining us. It is a great honor, given all your work in the conspiracy theory field. Although I respectfully disagree with some of your beliefs (e.g. JFK). I just read your invitation to join the audio chat. What I had previously replied to a similar invitation on IFERS was this: ifers.boards.net/post/1232/threadOh, me? Thanks for the invitation, I am honored, but, fakeologist, I cannot accept for a few reasons: 1) my English is not that good, I mean it's OK, but I speak with an Italian accent, worse than the Godfather 2) I would not want to say, on tape, something that I will later regret 3) I have not studied conspiracies enough to be able to debate them in a public chat, potentially heard by everyone in the world 4) probably some other reason that I am forgetting... just the thought of being in a voice chat, stresses me out even right now Maybe you could invite all the other 120 members of this forum. I am sure someone will accept. I hope they will then ask you all those questions I have, about your long list of shills, and about JFK and chemtrails. The reply to this last invitation, that I just wrote in the chat is this: Once again, I hope LIT, the founder of the forum, and all the other members are also invited to join your audio chat, too, so I hope if anyone is not too shy, that they will join you and express our point of view on flat earth, conspiracy theories, Mark Sargent, Eric Dubay and other flat earth theorists. zero11s? @jess? Lion?... are you ready for a (public) audio chat? This would be a great opportunity for us. I will go check out your last audio chat right now, because you probably mentioned flat earth again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 9:04:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jayjay on Apr 11, 2015 9:35:31 GMT
flat earth truthI saw you got invited on his chat and shot over there to listen and got nothing. Thought I was using audio chat wrong. I respect your decision for not wanting to go on, but would have enjoyed it. I think he chose you because you seem to be the most active and affected member. I also think you need to look at some jfk evidence a little harder (or maybe less hard and more simple) to understand the fakeologist view on the matter. When I have some time, I will post you some info and thoughts on one of the other boards. You may not agree with it, but I think you may at least stop wanting to use it as a black mark against fakeologist
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 9:47:08 GMT
Yes, jayjay, by all means start a thread on the JFK assassination. I would be glad to see people respectfully disagreeing with me, so we can show IFERS that we are not like them. And I would also be glad to be contradicted on the other things we disagree with: chemtrails and his list of shills. I respectfully disagree with fakeologist on many things. Since you are a listener or maybe even a member of that community, could you speak for this forum (regarding our disagreement with IFERS for example) on their audio chat? I am sure their invitation is not only open to anyone here but also to anyone on the web. I am too ignorant on flat earth and my accent is just too bad for me to abuse the listeners and the host. I prefer to focus on what I am good at, which is watching YouTube videos and classifying them in my folders, and commenting on them, minute by minute. |
|
|
|
Post by efrohi on Apr 11, 2015 10:00:43 GMT
"On AIDS - fakeologist (AB) doubts the main scientists explaining AIDS. What he says goes in favor of the hypothesis that he's not a shill." What means this ? There are no pathogen viruses at all ... Its a hoax, maybe the biggest : neue-medizin.com/lanka2.htm |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 10:07:24 GMT
Thanks for the feedback on that. So you're with the group who thinks that AIDS does not exist. That is one advanced school of thought, because it requires quite a bit of knowledge on biology and medicine. Personally, I was convinced of the Dr.Day-Dr.Dunegan (cf. drrichardday.wordpress.com/audio/) and Dr.Horowitz school of thought, that AIDS is part of a depopulation agenda, created in a lab by the powers that be, to target certain populations. Here's a good video on it: |
|
|
|
Post by efrohi on Apr 11, 2015 13:30:02 GMT
LOL ... They cant create life. Its simple like that. Just poison.
Dr. Stefan Lanka is a virologist also. A expert.
There are no pathogen viruses at all.
Microbe exist and they are important.
Of course the docs say they created it, Like the astro nuts who talking about aliens and ufo in space ... LOL ...
|
|
|
|
Post by zero11s on Apr 11, 2015 13:50:03 GMT
LOL ... They cant create life. Its simple like that. Just poison. Dr. Stefan Lanka is a virologist also. A expert. There are no pathogen viruses at all. Microbe exist and they are important. Of course the docs say they created it, Like the astro nuts who talking about aliens and ufo in space ... LOL ... It´s like Genetics "yeah we will modify humans (still learning from nature itself)"  just a bunch of bullshit promises like the ones from NASA. |
|
|
|
Post by efrohi on Apr 11, 2015 14:42:48 GMT
Yes ... :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by zero11s on Apr 12, 2015 10:01:52 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2015 9:01:11 GMT
ifers.boards.net/post/4629/threadWhat say you now Cobracommander? This was your first post. Your second post was to say it's 100% him. So you're now yet another suspicious character associated with "fakeologist" just like Acenci, Passagero, Unreal, and of course Mark Sargent. Also, just like Mark Sargent, fakeologist has long been a member here at IFERS but refuses to post anything. Mark joined IFERS on March 9th, Fakeologist joined us on March 12th. The last time Mark even signed in however was March 10th, fakeologist was last signed in 12 hours ago... right around when cobracommander posted the video ;-) Just sayin'. These people are in good faith when they say such things. It is very interesting to see how people can be lead astray and mistake fans for "shills", and how their judgment can be so clouded as to not remember that I was the one suspecting fakeologist for his "shills" list (that includes people I trust). Now, according to Eric's faulty reasoning, we are all part of a single group of "shills". If his flat earth research is as valid as his "shills" research, then we are in trouble.
|
|
just a bunch of bullshit promises like the ones from NASA.