|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 5, 2015 13:57:31 GMT
This guy hurts the concave earth theory just by him endorsing it...
He's a NASA employee!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2015 15:02:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 5, 2015 18:28:34 GMT
lol this Anthony guy is retarded. Pete is not a shill.
|
|
|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 5, 2015 20:51:31 GMT
lol this Anthony guy is retarded. Pete is not a shill. Haha! Steve, Peter James is the most obvious shill on YouTube. I got him so flustered that he called me at home. His NASA employment is a major red flag. |
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 6, 2015 0:22:17 GMT
lol this Anthony guy is retarded. Pete is not a shill. Haha! Steve, Peter James is the most obvious shill on YouTube. I got him so flustered that he called me at home. His NASA employment is a major red flag. well what did he say? you should really investigate matters first before you label people. but you should understand this, there is no effort by nasa or any other org to push concave earth, because it's the truth, and they don't like pushing truth. |
|
|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 6, 2015 1:35:13 GMT
Haha! Steve, Peter James is the most obvious shill on YouTube. I got him so flustered that he called me at home. His NASA employment is a major red flag. well what did he say? you should really investigate matters first before you label people. but you should understand this, there is no effort by nasa or any other org to push concave earth, because it's the truth, and they don't like pushing truth. Steve, I've investigated Peter James Kuehlen for 4 months, once he started stalking me. I've got more than enough evidence this guy is a definite shill. If I were you, I'd be pretty upset a NASA agent is hijacking your theory and tarnishing your work by saying the Earth is Concave, but pushing this Planet X and Nemisis garbage for the Convex Earth theory. If he's a good dude, ask him where these images are he interpreted so you can finally prove Concave theory. You know what's strange... He said he believes the Earth is Concave even though he had access to NASA satellite imagery. Wouldn't somebody that had access to those images KNOW the Earth was concave and not just BELIEVE it was concave??? Peter J Kuehlen has some serious explaining to do |
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 6, 2015 1:40:52 GMT
well what did he say? you should really investigate matters first before you label people. but you should understand this, there is no effort by nasa or any other org to push concave earth, because it's the truth, and they don't like pushing truth. Steve, I've investigated Peter James Kuehlen for 4 months, once he started stalking me. I've got more than enough evidence this guy is a definite shill. If I were you, I'd be pretty upset a NASA agent is hijacking your theory and tarnishing your work by saying the Earth is Concave, but pushing this Planet X and Nemisis garbage for the Convex Earth theory. If he's a good dude, ask him where these images are he interpreted so you can finally prove Concave theory. You know what's strange... He said he believes the Earth is Concave even though he had access to NASA satellite imagery. Wouldn't somebody that had access to those images KNOW the Earth was concave and not just BELIEVE it was concave??? Peter J Kuehlen has some serious explaining to do I asked to skype with you. I don't really take time to investigate people, so why dont you call me and tell me what you know. steviethefox is my skype. |
|
|
|
Post by dove on May 6, 2015 1:46:08 GMT
It is all part of the plan, I would say to ignore the guy and continue on spreading the truth, calling someone a shill may not change anything, can lead to something worse. Most of us have this small hatred against the System, I do to, but hatred will add more fire to the fire Speaking of fire, how hot can the hottest temperature be under the flat earth? How cold can things get?  |
|
|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 6, 2015 2:58:29 GMT
It is all part of the plan, I would say to ignore the guy and continue on spreading the truth, calling someone a shill may not change anything, can lead to something worse. Most of us have this small hatred against the System, I do to, but hatred will add more fire to the fire Speaking of fire, how hot can the hottest temperature be under the flat earth? How cold can things get? showing people who are the shills helps lead them away from the path of disinformation, so they can find the true truth. If we just sit back and allow people to mislead people without questioning their suspiciocious actions, then nobody will ever take us serious researchers serious. I'm not calling the guy a shill. He is a shill. A shill is a plant, a stooge. He's guilty as charged. |
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 6, 2015 4:06:33 GMT
what the fuck is your problem? you really gonna ignore me? okie dokie, champ.
|
|
|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 6, 2015 22:38:38 GMT
what the fuck is your problem? you really gonna ignore me? okie dokie, champ. my video is enough proof he is a shill. I can go on about how he pushed the Transasia Hoax as real, and. I caught him in yet another lie, or I could share messages between him and I that prove it again. I don't need to, though. Anyone with common sense can watch my vid and easily see he is shilling for 2 separate Earth models. He's also shilling the alien agenda hoax. |
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 9, 2015 5:26:27 GMT
what the fuck is your problem? you really gonna ignore me? okie dokie, champ. my video is enough proof he is a shill. I can go on about how he pushed the Transasia Hoax as real, and. I caught him in yet another lie, or I could share messages between him and I that prove it again. I don't need to, though. Anyone with common sense can watch my vid and easily see he is shilling for 2 separate Earth models. He's also shilling the alien agenda hoax.  |
|
|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 9, 2015 7:00:25 GMT
You want me to share the rest of that Skype conversation, Sith Lord Steve? Here you go...
"That makes no sense, and I didn't attack you. Nothing I said was wrong."
Sounds like somebody is upset that I showed Peter James Kuehlen's agenda? Is it because you use research from that proven fraud to back up your theory? I haven't watched your videos, but somebody who has said you do on multiple occasions. Only video I watched of yours just happened to be the same Chicago Skyline across Lake Michigan video.
Since you seem to be buddies with Peter Kuehlen, why don't you ask him why he says Nibiru, Planet X, Nemisis are coming to destroy is from outer space? Then ask him how that would be if he believed in a concave Earth, there would technically be just an inner space? There's no possible way to have a Nibiru and Nemisis in an in closed Earth that are coming to destroy us.
After you finish asking him them questions, ask him where we can see all those beautiful satellite pictures of the concave earth or convex earth of both the Earrh shapes he endorsed are?
You seem very very paranoid about this Peter James Expose'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2015 8:56:19 GMT
We are running a banner at IFERS that says we offer "freedom of speech and respect":  There is freedom of speech, almost complete. However, respect has been lacking lately. Please help us out. One can say "you're an idiot" but one can also say "I believe you're not assessing these facts correctly, and I am very resentful for your statements". One can say "This person is a shill" but one can also say "I don't see any grounds for the assertions he is making" or "his assertions do not convince me at all". Or one could simply state some facts (e.g.: "This person seems to be linked with NASA, because..."). without using any derogatory terms to draw conclusions. |
|
|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 9, 2015 23:28:13 GMT
We are running a banner at IFERS that says we offer "freedom of speech and respect": View AttachmentThere is freedom of speech, almost complete. However, respect has been lacking lately. Please help us out. One can say "you're an idiot" but one can also say "I believe you're not assessing these facts correctly, and I am very resentful for your statements". One can say "This person is a shill" but one can also say "I don't see any grounds for the assertions he is making" or "his assertions do not convince sßme at all". Or one could simply state some facts (e.g.: "This person seems to be linked with NASA, because..."). without using any derogatory terms to draw conclusions. I brought up fair points in every post, and did not use the ad-hominem attacks in revenge of ad-hominem attacks in any post. I laid out one of the many proofs Peter James is a shill, and a respectful debate would have stated why he isn't. That would be a hard task to do, because the evidence is very damning. The shill word may seem derogatory, because it has been unjustly been used on innocent people (by real shills trying to tarnish the word). The definition of the word shill is a plant or a stooge put in place by an organization or a person to disrupt a group of people. Throwing out the term shill with no proof is wrong. In this case, I had every right to use the correct term for this Peter James stooge/plant. He's a no good dirty rotten scoundrel trying to sell a bunch of lies to the public. The more of these fake Truthers that are exposed, the more clear the real truth can become. |
|
