|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:14:33 GMT
It started at 7:56 for me just now. Exactly where I meant
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:15:45 GMT
Yeah, what if he is sitting there and not able to talk like the boylan video says about him? That's what made me think like that. Something I never thought about until I listened to the video.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:16:28 GMT
Did you listen to the interview to know the context of why I would say that?
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 6:17:38 GMT
It started at 7:56 for me just now. Exactly where I meant Agreed. That was the video i was referring to which i was supposed to find with the time |
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 6:19:31 GMT
Did you listen to the interview to know the context of why I would say that? So it is your text..............no i did not. You are saying the man cannot even talk and they are leaving the voice there anywhere. Why? An aircraft technician can show you the world is round. What point is there in attacking a 73 year old man? |
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:19:42 GMT
Yeah, you can read whatever you want into it. I didn't accuse you of anything. I think it's interesting you didn't know about the first video. And you didn't see the links after I told you which posts were in it. And your original response appeared not to have context of the previous posts. I can now see you provided a link in a post with no time in a post. When that video is opened it starts at minute 8:30 which is obviously what i was supposed to find. For some reason you expect me to run around for you to check your ideas when all you could have done is made it clearer what you wanted me to look at What actually is interesting in the fact i could not find the video? Nothing of consequence at all. You just made it hard for me to find that video by refusing to deal with my questions in a reasonable manner No, I didn't make it hard for you. I told you specfically which posts, the original post and mine. After you said you didn't know about the 1st video of her. The video that was posted to show a good space video that looks like it could prove space travel is real. The topic was That video and you couldn't find it? |
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:22:13 GMT
I am not attacking a 73 year old man. You just said you didn't watch the video. And you don't understand why I would say that about him sitting there and not able to talk and you claim that means I am attacking him? You don't even know what was said in the original video? That's why I would say that, because of what they were saying. Something hard for me to believe but it's what caused me to think that.
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 6:24:38 GMT
I can now see you provided a link in a post with no time in a post. When that video is opened it starts at minute 8:30 which is obviously what i was supposed to find. For some reason you expect me to run around for you to check your ideas when all you could have done is made it clearer what you wanted me to look at What actually is interesting in the fact i could not find the video? Nothing of consequence at all. You just made it hard for me to find that video by refusing to deal with my questions in a reasonable manner No, I didn't make it hard for you. I told you specfically which posts, the original post and mine. After you said you didn't know about the 1st video of her. The video that was posted to show a good space video that looks like it could prove space travel is real. The topic was That video and you couldn't find it? I told you i could not find a post of yours with a video in it with a time. Your posts only had links with no time |
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 6:26:05 GMT
I am not attacking a 73 year old man. You just said you didn't watch the video. And you don't understand why I would say that about him sitting there and not able to talk and you claim that means I am attacking him? You don't even know what was said in the original video? That's why I would say that, because of what they were saying. Something hard for me to believe but it's what caused me to think that. You are a liar. You are attacking him. You are trying to make out that he cannot be producing communication with his cheek or however he is able to do that. The fact you are doing that has nothing to do with whatever happened to make you attack him. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2015 6:53:15 GMT
Many "conspiracy theorists" (including me) suspect those videos to be fake. We will try to find a way to express our thoughts without offending anyone in the future.
Thanks for the feedback on how this subject and our discussion of it has made you feel. We will keep it in mind for future discussions.
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 7:19:17 GMT
Many "conspiracy theorists" (including me) suspect those videos to be fake. We will try to find a way to express our thoughts without offending anyone in the future. Thanks for the feedback on how this subject and our discussion of it has made you feel. We will keep it in mind for future discussions. All of the flat earth 'research' is based on deceit or delusion. It is even impossible to navigate using a flat earth map where sailors have known for centuries distances along longitudes in the southern hemisphere are the same as in the northern longitudes The moon the sun and the stars dont work for you in the southern hemisphere. The ship compass has to be adjusted differently in the southern hemisphere exactly oppositely to the way it is adjusted in the north. Inertial guidance shows a round world. GPS shows a round world. It offends my brain that reason has no influence upon any of you. It is impossible to do what you do without offending people so you had better get used to it. Zhib Rhan has a better approach to the problem. You guys are fighting a war. You need to harden up and face the enemy. |
|
|
|
Post by marlon on May 3, 2015 7:44:06 GMT
Helicentrism is just sun worship under a different label, the great delusion that holds mankind enslaved to chaos and unreason. To me it makes perfect sense that Stephen Hawking doesn't know what day of the week it is, like the science community and their laughable brand of hokum, it's all an illusion.
|
|
|
|
Post by preciousjewel on May 3, 2015 8:06:44 GMT
Helicentrism is just sun worship under a different label, the great delusion that holds mankind enslaved to chaos and unreason. To me it makes perfect sense that Stephen Hawking doesn't know what day of the week it is, like the science community and their laughable brand of hokum, it's all an illusion. *like* As my *like* button has vanished, I'll have to quote and say it instead when I agree. :-D ☆★☆★☆WELCOME ★☆★☆★ by the way! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2015 8:08:56 GMT
Yeah, good points, marlon. I guess we could say "this is all an illusion", something that reminds me of what fakeologist always stresses out, although I don't agree with everything he says (e.g.: JFK). Thinking that it is an illusion should not offend any members of the forum, so we keep our mutual respect, and we also keep our free speech. The "like" button was probably removed by the administrator, preciousjewel. I don't see it either. |
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 3, 2015 8:09:04 GMT
aliveandkickingYou can't be serious. It is a completely reasonable thing to doubt that Stephen Hawking still has the ability to be so productive. Actually, it is surprising it never occurred to you. I know people who hardly believe in any conspiracy, but they still see there is something suspicious about Stephen Hawking. Not to mention that his views on fundamental issues constantly change. It is almost funny to follow his newest "discoveries" and what he "says" in "interviews". I can easily imagine that he is just a frontman, but someone else talks through him literally.
|
|
|
|
Post by preciousjewel on May 3, 2015 8:11:08 GMT
Exactly, if they can pull off that the earth spins around 1000 mph around the sun at 32 times the speed of a bullet, then it isn't far fetched to think that Stephen is being used as a puppet. That's child's play really.
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 8:15:55 GMT
aliveandkickingYou can't be serious. It is a completely reasonable thing to doubt that Stephen Hawking still has the ability to be so productive. Actually, it is surprising it never occurred to you. I know people who hardly believe in any conspiracy, but they still see there is something suspicious about Steven Hawking. Not to mention that his views on fundamental issues constantly change. It is almost funny to follow his newest "discoveries" and what he "says" in "interviews". I can easily imagine that he is just a frontman, but someone else talks through him literally. He may well have a ghost writer to help him produce books where his input is only to guide the process where the core of what he says that is original is quite small. It is possible his friends suggest ideas to him so he can get the credit and earn a living while they have sufficient work already. But if simple physics shows the world to be round, all of the conspiracy stuff to say otherwise is totally daft |
|
|
|
Post by sceptimatic on May 3, 2015 8:19:34 GMT
Some honesty is needed here. If people cannot understand something as relatively simple as the physics of a gun, they have no chance of understanding what an advanced theoretical physics professor can tell them. If something as simple as aircraft navigation systems are proving the world is round, why do you need to attack a 73 year old crippled man? I don't want to get into a tit for tat with you because overall it will be pointless. It's clear that you're trying to make out you're some kind of ballistics expert, plus an explosives expert to go along with that, as well as a rocket scientist, etc. It's no surprise to me that you would immediately go into the emotional aspect of Hawking to stop people questioning what should be clear as day, needs questioning Trust me. I've dealt with better mainstream indoctrinates than you, but essentially you all sing from the same hymn sheet. You mention the sim;icity of the physics of a gun and yet you equate it to rocket scoence. Hahahaha. Givce it up and enjoy some free thinking time. This is a site for free thinkers. You are not displaying anything other than regurgitation of mainstream bullshit. All you serious free thinkers out there. To get on in terms of questioning, you need to make sure you don't allow yourself to buy into this person's attempts to muddy your thoughts. |
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 3, 2015 8:27:52 GMT
aliveandkickingYou can't be serious. It is a completely reasonable thing to doubt that Stephen Hawking still has the ability to be so productive. Actually, it is surprising it never occurred to you. I know people who hardly believe in any conspiracy, but they still see there is something suspicious about Steven Hawking. Not to mention that his views on fundamental issues constantly change. It is almost funny to follow his newest "discoveries" and what he "says" in "interviews". I can easily imagine that he is just a frontman, but someone else talks through him literally. He may well have a ghost writer to help him produce books where his input is only to guide the process where the core of what he says that is original is quite small. It is possible his friends suggest ideas to him so he can get the credit and earn a living while they have sufficient work already. But if simple physics shows the world to be round, all of the conspiracy stuff to say otherwise is totally daft Yeah, so you agree that he might have a ghost writer. Then you're reasonable enough. I thought we were discussing Stephen Hawking here? I don't think there is enough strong evidence to prove the Earth is flat. In fact the evidence points to it being round. It is well known by anyone who doesn't prefer to deny the obvious. Those who say otherwise are just purposefully blind to the facts for one reason or another. Somehow they deny obvious things like the fact that their map is bullshit, and no one can ever produce a flat Earth map which shows the distance between South America and Australia to actually make sense. If the Earth were really flat it would be very easy to draw a correct map, and there would be no distortion at all. The distances would match perfectly, the proportions and the sizes too, but I thought we were talking about Stephen? |
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 8:29:01 GMT
Some honesty is needed here. It's clear that you're trying to make out you're some kind of ballistics expert I only showed that your instantaneous acceleration idea was based on your misunderstandings. It is simple physics that a guns recoil involves the same simple physics as a rocket engine. |
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 8:31:05 GMT
He may well have a ghost writer to help him produce books where his input is only to guide the process where the core of what he says that is original is quite small. It is possible his friends suggest ideas to him so he can get the credit and earn a living while they have sufficient work already. But if simple physics shows the world to be round, all of the conspiracy stuff to say otherwise is totally daft I thought we were discussing Stephen Hawking here? You said it is easy to imagine he was a front man which is totally different to what i was saying. The topic here is something to do with Stephen and flat earth. |
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 3, 2015 8:32:50 GMT
aliveandkickingIt is about the same. It is good enough that you admit it is possible that he doesn't write his own books, but someone else does it for him. This counts as a conspiracy too.
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 8:38:08 GMT
aliveandkickingIt is about the same. It is good enough that you admit it is possible that he doesn't write his own books, but someone else does it for him. This counts as a conspiracy too. Front man is not the same. Obviously. I did not say he did not write his own books in the way you are saying. The designer of an aircraft also does not produce all of the plans and do all of the calculations -the designer takes a supervisor role. Stephen would still be the author |
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 3, 2015 8:40:52 GMT
Here is what one of the meanings of frontman is: a person who represents an organization and works to make its image more appealing to the public.
How is Stephen Hawking not a frontman? Anyway, I see you just like to argue forever. Can you prove that he actually produces the content of his speeches and the computer doesn't read something which was prepared by someone else? If you can't then you don't have any argument at all. I can't prove otherwise either, but so it seems.
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 8:43:33 GMT
Here is what one of the meanings of frontman is: a person who represents an organization and works to make its image more appealing to the public. How is Stephen Hawking not a frontman? Anyway, I see you just like to argue forever. Can you prove that he actually produces the content of his speeches and the computer doesn't read something which was prepared by someone else? If you can't then you don't have any argument at all. I can't prove otherwise either, but so it seems. You are doing it again. I dont believe stephen represents an organisation in the manner you are suggesting. A front man is only a token rep for an organisation who lacks authority |
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 3, 2015 8:48:25 GMT
Ok, I am done arguing with you. You are not really moving the discussion forward. You're just spamming the thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 8:48:37 GMT
>>It is almost funny to follow his newest "discoveries" and what he "says" in "interviews". I can easily imagine that he is just a frontman, but someone else talks through him literally.
What you were talking about then was totally clear.
Some kind of big bad conspiracy
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 8:50:29 GMT
Ok, I am done arguing with you. You are not really moving the discussion forward. You're just spamming the thread. Yes the thread was about stephen hawking the evil frontman and flat earth You objected to me making a connection between flat earthers and steven hawking and have been spamming the thread ever since |
|
|
|
Post by preciousjewel on May 3, 2015 10:43:59 GMT
aliveandkicking are you the NASA guy that floats in a shuttle playing his guitar? You so look like him!
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 10:45:46 GMT
aliveandkicking are you the NASA guy that floats in a shuttle playing his guitar? You so look like him! My wife said that but there is not so much likeness really. That is a picture of him. |
|
