|
Post by preciousjewel on Apr 30, 2015 10:57:51 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2015 12:19:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LIT on Apr 30, 2015 17:02:43 GMT
By the way, the guy's name is Stephen Hawking. The title of the thread is wrong
|
|
|
Post by preciousjewel on Apr 30, 2015 23:45:59 GMT
Lol.... that's funny!!! Yeah, he's not one to share when you are trying to convert someone!
Fixed the title. Thanks!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 2:33:40 GMT
Very possible and convincing analysis by @eschaton at IFERS: ifers.boards.net/post/5631/threadThanks to Acenci (who, by the way, liked my previous comment but is now agreeing with this video), I have just found out one of the voices on this video is Matt Boylan. What the hell? Is this a joke, or is he serious? I watched this on TheNasachannel a while back. It was obvious to me that they were not being serious. Matt believes that that they are using Hawking as a puppet but his friend was not really his handler. They were doing a comedy skit based on what they think is actually going on. I'm still on record saying I don't believe Matt really worked at NASA, I think that was a similar skit.
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 1, 2015 3:13:23 GMT
I listened to the TheNASAChannel Stephen Hawking discussion a number of months ago. It seemed fake to me even though they made me think about who is really talking and how do we know it's Hawking.
|
|
|
Post by preciousjewel on May 1, 2015 3:53:13 GMT
My friend mentioned that you don't see him! Still haven't viewed it myself.
Good point though! Maybe that was Mathew's way of showing, and making us *think*.
|
|
|
Post by preciousjewel on May 1, 2015 3:59:01 GMT
Very possible and convincing analysis by @eschaton at IFERS: ifers.boards.net/post/5631/threadI watched this on TheNasachannel a while back. It was obvious to me that they were not being serious. Matt believes that that they are using Hawking as a puppet but his friend was not really his handler. They were doing a comedy skit based on what they think is actually going on. I'm still on record saying I don't believe Matt really worked at NASA, I think that was a similar skit. Ahhhh... Just saw this quote, as I clicked only on Heathen's post first and answered him. So missed Acenci's quotes. That makes perfect sense to me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 4:02:27 GMT
Yeah, if it is a joke, then I'll consider Matt Boylan as unreliable from now on. But maybe it is not a joke. I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 1, 2015 4:40:27 GMT
It's hard for me to take him too seriously, because I never know if he's serious or not, so I don't know what to believe. Especially because of this video and his ressurrection one where he uses his own urine compresses to heal his face. So, the only thing I can take from him is if he says something that causes me to think or something logical.
|
|
|
Post by preciousjewel on May 1, 2015 4:59:42 GMT
I'm just annoyed I'm on a candida diet so can't enjoy him with a glass of red or two. That would so enhanced the experience.... lol.
He does come across quite trippy. I like him though, but wouldn't link him up to my non FE friends.
|
|
|
Post by sceptimatic on May 1, 2015 7:37:38 GMT
73 years old. A condition that kills most people in a few short years. A condition he gets aged 20 and yet is a world reknowned scientist. Do people really need to guess what's going on?
|
|
|
Post by preciousjewel on May 1, 2015 8:00:04 GMT
73 years old. A condition that kills most people in a few short years. A condition he gets aged 20 and yet is a world reknowned scientist. Do people really need to guess what's going on? Wow, is that how old he is? Yeah. .. That sounds fishy then!
|
|
|
Post by sceptimatic on May 1, 2015 9:16:33 GMT
73 years old. A condition that kills most people in a few short years. A condition he gets aged 20 and yet is a world reknowned scientist. Do people really need to guess what's going on? Wow, is that how old he is? Yeah. .. That sounds fishy then! Yep, 73 years of age and still going strong. No let up in his worldy appearances and his parabolic zero G flights and such like. A disease that once diagnosed goes on the rampage and renders most people incapacitated within a year or so and dead within a few years. Some medical marvels manage to defy it for maybe 5 to 10. By this time they are mentally and physically finished. Hawking is not only a super genius author and top scientist, world reknowned, he's even fathered children and authored books with them, as well as his own. Not only that but he travels the world giving speeches via his 1970's speak and spell machine that manages to decipher his cheek movements that none of us can see when he's actually supposed to be doing this. Most of the time he's not even looking at his screen when answering questions. I wonder why, I wonder why. Did you know that people with this condition cannot swallow because their throat muscles give up and they have to have a pipe inserted into a hole made into it. Hawking has one of these. This does not stop his supposed carer from feeding him a meat stew and shovelling it in his mouth. It's a sick world we live in and we are getting the absolute piss ripped out of us and we are loving it and asking for more. There's rich people enjoying the best that Earth has to offer on the back of bullshitting the every willing and gullible worker bees that make it possible for them to do so, yet the same worker bees have to work harder to own something they may be making themselves. The story tellers and the scientific fantasy we get sld through emotion, using people like Hawking or whoever the actor is. To think, a supposed world reknowned genius and author of world reknowned books, etc, reduced to having to use the very same speak and spell machine that was supposedly invented for him in the 70's. Nobody, not even him wants a machine that makes him sound like a human or can answer quickly. So what's going on? The truth is, I don't know. All I do know is this.....Hawking or whoever is sitting in that chair is not responsible for the noise coming from it, nor is responsible for the books and bullshit sold to us. People will never wake up to this stuff. Some just don't have the ability to emotionally detach themselves and would rather live on frenzied attacks of those that question this deliberate emotional content we all have to endure for a story to become so dear , when it should be clear to logical, rational thinking people that we are being systematically taken the piss out of.
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 1, 2015 9:29:00 GMT
@sceptimatic
It is great to have you here. I can't deny that what you write, although quite shocking and disturbing, raises a lot of reasonable questions. By the way, as far as I remember you don't believe in flat Earth beyond any doubt? Am I correct? I would like to hear your insight on flat Earth too, because it is obvious you're great at analysing conspiracies and debunking hoaxes very convincingly at that.
|
|
|
Post by sceptimatic on May 1, 2015 12:09:40 GMT
@sceptimatic It is great to have you here. I can't deny that what you write, although quite shocking and disturbing, raises a lot of reasonable questions. By the way, as far as I remember you don't believe in flat Earth beyond any doubt? Am I correct? I would like to hear your insight on flat Earth too, because it is obvious you're great at analysing conspiracies and debunking hoaxes very convincingly at that. I'll gladly explain my stance on what I believe the Earth to be. I'd love to also be able to say that everything is right with the world and conspiracies are nothing but wild imaginations. Sadly by logical views and thoughts, it's not the case. I have loads of thoughts on this world and what's going on within it. I feel I have enough logical thought and common sense to at least evaluate a lot of stuff and piece it together in a more potential logical form rather than what we have had to all suffer with ridiculous lies at worst and minor fibs at best. As far as Hawking goes, we are basically being asked to believe that our own great grandfathers have just won the olympic games by scoring perfect 10's in all competitions, then went on to run year long daily marathons to top up charities, whilst coming home to help great granny keep the house and garden in tip top condition as well as managing to keep a brood of 25 grandkids in check. Imagine telling your mates in the pub that?...You'd be called Billy liar and rightly so. Weirdly though we are quite happy to be told in the same pub that the someone's family member has ALS or Lou Gerhig's disease. When we ask how long he's been given to live, we get told " oh no, he got diagnosed 53 years ago and he's out doing tutoring at university. You see, with what we know about this disease- if someone came into the pub and actually told us this, we would literally shout, "yeah yeah, course" when the person left. Yet when mainstream scientists or whoever they are, push this stuff and place before us some outdated speak and spell with all the acting to go with it, we slip into emotional mode and buy into the bullshit stories given out. It's no different to the housewives choice in EX BAND MEMBER.....PROFESSOR Brian frigging Cox. Another bullshitter using a different emotional content or as housewife eye candly and a soft enough voice to make him convincing. To see through these people, you have to be able to detach yourself from all emotional content given out by the hypnotising creeps.
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 2, 2015 20:45:25 GMT
Makes me think of a secular oracle now. I still don't believe that interview sounds real though.
Hawking's ALS challenge
So, that thing on his cheek picks up muscle contractions from his cheek? There's enough cheek twitch variations that can accommodate all that language? I never thought about him too much before the Boylan video, I wasn't interested in him. Now I think, what if he's not able to talk and he's just sitting there>? And they keep that old computer voice for some reason? I don't even watch videos where people use the more modern computer voices.
Speak and Spell sound
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 4:46:52 GMT
What do you think of this? Part 2 in particular?
Part 2
This is part 1
and part 3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2015 5:15:01 GMT
50-50 in my opinion. Really uncertain.
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 5:31:47 GMT
Some honesty is needed here. If people cannot understand something as relatively simple as the physics of a gun, they have no chance of understanding what an advanced theoretical physics professor can tell them.
If something as simple as aircraft navigation systems are proving the world is round, why do you need to attack a 73 year old crippled man?
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 5:51:32 GMT
This thread isn't about understanding physics as far as I can tell. It's not that I cannot understand the physics of a gun. It's the physics of a gun outside of an atmosphere. The welded gun, air tight, would be the atmosphere that the space lacks. That was my point. In the other thread that I left, you came across as not having read the previous posts and was commenting on a video I brought up to show the possibility of wearing make up along with gel or hair spray after acenci brought up her skin tone and flesh previous to that. Maybe you should read threads. This thread is about a Matt Boylan and an interview and what he says in that. It doesn't have anything to do with understanding the physics of what Hawkings says as of yet, from what I can tell. Maybe you should have read this one too?
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 5:59:13 GMT
Some honesty is needed here. If people cannot understand something as relatively simple as the physics of a gun, they have no chance of understanding what an advanced theoretical physics professor can tell them. If something as simple as aircraft navigation systems are proving the world is round, why do you need to attack a 73 year old crippled man? Look at when the original video was made. That's what the topic was on. It's about what Matt Boylan says in the video. A video I don't even necessarily believe is real. A video that comes across as someone's account of their experience. Not only that, read the title of this thread.
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:00:21 GMT
You come across as not even knowing what is said about Hawkings in the video.
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 6:01:10 GMT
This thread isn't about understanding physics as far as I can tell. It's not that I cannot understand the physics of a gun. It's the physics of a gun outside of an atmosphere. The welded gun, air tight, would be the atmosphere that the space lacks. That was my point. In the other thread that I left, you came across as not having read the previous posts and was commenting on a video I brought up to show the possibility of wearing make up along with gel or hair spray after acenci brought up her skin tone and flesh previous to that. Maybe you should read threads. This thread is about a Matt Boylan and an interview and what he says in that. It doesn't have anything to do with understanding the physics of what Hawkings says as of yet, from what I can tell. Maybe you should have read this one too? I said i could not find a post with a video and time and you accused me of dishonesty for that. You made it clear on the rocket thread you had no interest in debating. I fully answered you anyway. Clearly my answers are dealing with the idea a gun cannot be used in space. This thread appears to be about Stephen hawking. the last comments have been about stephen hawking. You suggested he was a liar or too stupid to know better than what his controllers were doing.
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:03:06 GMT
I didn't accuse you of anything. I found it interesting you were confused of where to find a link twhen I specifically said which one. And previous to that I mentioned the 1st video which you didn't seem to know about. The video in the original post.
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 6:04:35 GMT
I didn't accuse you of anything. I found it interesting you were confused of where to find it when I specifically said which one. And previous to that I mentioned the 1st video which you didn't seem to know about. The video in the original post. Bullshit
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:05:23 GMT
I said 1 post in that thread. I thought he made sense (sceptomatic).
You said~
This thread appears to be about Stephen hawking. the last comments have been about stephen hawking. You suggested he was a liar or too stupid to know better than what his controllers were doing.
No, I didn't. I mentioned some videos and asked what they thought. I didn't say what I agreed to or thought.
Do you even know what the interview said?
|
|
|
Post by heathen on May 3, 2015 6:06:57 GMT
I didn't accuse you of anything. I found it interesting you were confused of where to find it when I specifically said which one. And previous to that I mentioned the 1st video which you didn't seem to know about. The video in the original post. Bullshit Yeah, you can read whatever you want into it. I didn't accuse you of anything. I think it's interesting you didn't know about the first video. And you didn't see the links after I told you which posts were in it. And your original response appeared not to have context of the previous posts.
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 6:10:28 GMT
Yeah, you can read whatever you want into it. I didn't accuse you of anything. I think it's interesting you didn't know about the first video. And you didn't see the links after I told you which posts were in it. And your original response appeared not to have context of the previous posts. I can now see you provided a link in a post with no time in a post. When that video is opened it starts at minute 8:30 which is obviously what i was supposed to find. For some reason you expect me to run around for you to check your ideas when all you could have done is made it clearer what you wanted me to look at What actually is interesting in the fact i could not find the video? Nothing of consequence at all. You just made it hard for me to find that video by refusing to deal with my questions in a reasonable manner
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on May 3, 2015 6:13:31 GMT
are you saying this is not your text?
Hawking's ALS challenge
So, that thing on his cheek picks up muscle contractions from his cheek? There's enough cheek twitch variations that can accommodate all that language? I never thought about him too much before the Boylan video, I wasn't interested in him. Now I think, what if he's not able to talk and he's just sitting there>? And they keep that old computer voice for some reason? I don't even watch videos where people use the more modern computer voices.
Speak and Spell sound
|
|