Flat Earth shills and trolls

Oh, yeah, George Harrison, his post is here, for the record:
ifers.boards.net/post/4941/thread

Well, despite the fact that I obviously resent having been banned, I have to say that I think they are all in good faith: Dubay, George Harrison, the lizard, too. One almost cannot be resentful if he fully grasps how they are thinking. I don't think they even meant to be rude to us, considering how things evolved and the number of people they have banned since the end of March.

I don't know about Dubay anymore. There might be some jealousy towards Mark Sargent in my banning (I kept doubting that he was a "shill" and kept posting his interviews), but I would bet money on the fact that the Lizard and George Harrison really think I and many others are paid internet "shills". They have been totally coherent in stating their thoughts on this. I have not seen any inconsistencies. Dubay maybe knows that some of us are not shills, but it is too late for him to admit the mistake. Also, I would be more offended for being banned if he said "I don't like you as a person, so I ban you" than "you're working for the government, so I ban you".

If he is indeed pretending, then I prefer that he keeps pretending that we are all shills. I take it less personally that way.

But if I had to bet money, I would also bet on the fact that he is not pretending either, and that he believes we are "shills".

A blog, youtube channel, a book promoting flat earth. Then make a public forum. At the forum many people who are interested get quickly banned and called shills. Pretty weird to me.

Even if flat earth is the absolute truth, why would there need to be paid shills to discredit it, when the vast majority of the world consider it something to be laughed at and mocked? You don't need to pay all these numbers of people to troll or mock it, they would do it on their own or, more likely, ignore it. It's not something that is even generally doubted.