Vortex

No no no. That’s an irrotational vortex which proves that the atmosphere does NOT move with the crust. What is an irrotational vortex? One where the center moves at a much faster speed at the core and gets increasingly slower further out from the core. Examples are whirlwinds, and all water vortices, i.e. blenders (they are strictly speaking rankine vortices where the core itself moves at one speed). An example of a rotational vortex is any spinning solid object such as a spinning wheel or funwheel or roundabout at a park. This solid vortex spins in tandem from core to circumference. en.wikipedia.org/?title=Vortex#Irrotational_vortices

Why do spinning gases and liquids not move in tandem throughout their vortex compared to spinning solids? Because the molecular bonding between the molecules (or “friction”) is much much weaker in gases and liquids than solids obviously! It has nothing to do with friction of the glass on the outside of a blender.

And these unresolved forces come from… the movement of the ether. It is “space” that moves, not the Earth as proven by George Airy. Maurice Allais has also shown us that Foucault’s pendulum does NOT demonstrate the rotation of the Earth.Firstly, the Coriolis effect is NOT a force. Secondly, it can NOT cause atmospheric phenomena for a variety of reasons. Read the bottom of part 1 to see why. It has been proven that it is the heavens which move in a circular motion, not Earth; and Foucault’s pendulum shows unresolved forces, which can only come from the movement of the ether as proved by Sagnac and Gale, which therefore gives us the shape of the weather systems, leading to the probable conclusion that the ether also moves in a vortex fashion (at least whilst in a downward direction towards the Earth).