Midnight sun in Antarctica

1. In the northern hemisphere there are thousands of ordinary hobbyists living near the arctic circle who are able to make equipment that can rotate the camera to produce the 360 degree time lapse and yet very few videos are available.

2. Far fewer people are able to afford the journey to Antarctica

The picture you like is possibly taken with the camera simply pointing upwards using a fish eye lens.  To produce an ordinary looking video requires the camera to be on a platform that rotates once per day.

That video is not good enough for me because it is not as good as the ones from the North Pole. None of those videos Antarctica videos are as good as my best Arctic video, in that they do not show the full path of the sun in the sky.

And I am neither "trolling" nor "lying". It is time for you to accept that others won't always agree with you.

I have enough knowledge to know that I am right about the lighthouses. I just don't like to show off my knowledge.

Your explanation of the reasons why there are no good videos of the midnight sun in Antarctica does not satisfy me. By now, with all the money they have, we should have a good video of the midnight sun in Antarctica, too.

I think it is time for you, too, to accept that people won't always agree with you, especially if you don't have any valid instruments of torture.

flat earth truth

Well, I am sure if they knew so many people would care about it and few videos won't be enough, they would have provided 1000 videos(actually what is the acceptable number for you to believe it is real?).

By the way, I am sure if you send an e-mail to one of the research stations there, you should expect to see many more videos on youtube in the near future. However, I don't think you would believe they are real either.

You have already made up your mind that they are fake. What is necessary to convince you they are real? This is a serious question.

As for the lighthouses, although this is not the place to discuss it, I very much doubt that you're the only person in the world who has knowledge of that topic, but you're probably the only one who claims the visibility ranges are wrong.

How do you explain that?

I’ve also been thinking about this question and I would like share my thoughts about my theory to try and verify 24/7 sunlight in Antarctica on a Flat Earth;

What if the Sun ascends once a year and descends once a year, still circling around the center of the earth (north-pole), but instead of making larger/smaller circles or spirals, gaining higher and lower altitudes (once high, once low a year with the solstice) and the Sun’s light beam making a larger and smaller spotlight on the earth, thus the light reaching further North and South in June, while almost no sunlight/darkness in December in North and South. Following my theory, the summer in the Arctic and Antarctica is in June, and both have indeed 24 hours light, while complete darkness in December. The Sun elevating a certain distance higher/lower. I thought that due to conditions in the atmosphere it might be possible for heat and light to reach far enough North and South to have a summer there (on high) while Australia and New Zealand having their winter as usual and vice versa (on low).

It’s very hard for me to verify any information regarding Antarctica and sources such as Jeffrey Donenfeld whom claims 24/7 sunlight in his video titled "Enerplex in Antarctica" cannot be verified either, and although this guy is a bit funny, the title implies a commercial for a Solar-panel and/or perhaps his other brand new gear? Otherwise I can imagine that students and scientist have to sign a contract with the military, and perhaps have to lie because non-24/7-light is classified information?

What does anyone think of my theory? If it’s interesting I can make some images to illustrate how this works out on the flat earth map, I also have to program something in PHP to calculate the (sunrise/sunset/hours-of-light) at various distances from the poles because manually I came to some surprising results, by doing so I assume that if I measure roughly 5000km from the Poles in Google Earth to say Antarctica to Hobart (Australia) for example, and then measure from the Arctic to Bordeaux (France) which is 25m above sea level near the coast. Measuring from the absolute center of each pole, I expect to have the same total hours of daylight at those locations in each summer and winter? Perhaps I am unaware of a ‘scientific’ explanation if the total daylight hours differ much?
I can also confirm that the midnight Sun at the North Cape in Norway 2000 KM south of the North Pole is only fully visible on (and around) June 21, where it just stays above the horizon the whole day.

Thank you all for your valuable information, I am fascinated about the Flat Earth and I am currently reading some of the old books on the subject as well, very interesting theory so far which seems to make a lot more sense than the globe, I never really got it when I was kid, while the Flat Earth theory seems very natural to me.

Cheers, XPLRY

How can you tell where the video is from? North or South Pole? Apart from this, the videos from the Amundsen-Scott South Pole station seem very real to me. What is fake about them? Is it the same kind of reasoning as "the Earth seems flat, so it can't be round"?

You don't have to do any work. However, you can't expect people to accept your opinion either. The videos were not made for people like you. Their purpose wasn't to convince you the Earth is round. Actually, no scientist cares about what some people on youtube think.The thing is that it is stupid to claim something is true if you can't prove it. This is especially so, if your claim denies what everyone else says. How can you argue with people if you don't have any evidence?

Wow, no posts for 4 months. Is this still happening? After being banned from Ifers for telling the truth about 2 flights I took from Sydney to Santiago (which according to the guys at Ifers are bogus flights, don't exist)......I got banned on my 3rd post. I had prepared this post about the Antarctic, but did not get a chance to submit. So just found this forum tonight and see that acenci doesn't believe their is midnight sun in the Antarctic either. Eric also believes all the days are very short throughout the year. This is totally wrong. I have been there. I don't have any videos, but here is my post as it would have been (would have been banned for sure). This is what I wrote:


Hello Eric, I am having trouble reconciling the light source in the Antarctic. Do you think there is any possibility of another sun (apart from Rahu, the black sun)? In the Antarctic winter there is a period of no sun all day, from mid-June to the end of June. Then the days have a little light (about an hour) a type of twilight, gradually extending until the end of November, when there is a 22-hour day.

I have been to the Antarctic for a 3-week trip in 2008. I flew from Sydney to Santiago (direct flight). I have checked the flight details and it took 17 hours and 15 minutes. Does this sound possible on the flat earth model? I am not sure how to work it out.

I was not in Antarctica around the solstice, it was early March, but the days were about 14 hours long. There are sight-seeing flights from Australia and New Zealand and I have rung for the details. The sun (?) shines all day from December 1st until January 12th. On New Year’s Eve you can fly to the Antarctic from Melbourne and you will see the first icebergs after 3 hours. The flight leaves at 6:30pm. They have 19 different flight plans they decide from depending on the weather, to give you the best (cloudless) view, but it is daylight the entire time. When you get to the continent they fly around for 4 hours before heading back to Australia. I am very tempted to take the trip to see what is visible. I guess they will not take us anywhere sensitive to reveal that the earth is flat, or ends at the outer edge. It is also very expensive.

The Antarctic has been my passion for many years and I have read several books of the early explorers of the “Heroic Age”, such as Scott, Shackleton and Mawson. I am very sure that the light is as it is told about in these books and verified on timeanddate.com. An example, at Casey Station today, 6th November, the sun rose at 3:30am and will set at 9:16pm with nautical twilight for the rest of the night. In Melbourne (where I live) we share the same time zone as Casey Station. Today the sun rose at 6:09am and will set at 7:59pm. Our day is about 4 hours shorter than that at Casey Station in the Antarctic, and we are 2387 miles further north.

There has to be some explanation for this phenomenon? I am convinced that we do not live on a spinning globe, but I am at a loss to explain the light in the Antarctic. I can see from your comments that you do not believe there is this light, so you are not investigating, but I am continuing research in this area, and I will post anything I can come up with.

Actually, Casey Station shows on the “map” as being below Perth, which is 3 hours difference in time to Melbourne. Hmmmm why does it show as in Melbourne’s time zone. I think I will look further into this.

In year 2019 there are lot of TV shows coming out. Obviously, there are Avengers part 2, new Star Wars Episode nine and many others. These are films that every person wants to see, but sometimes you can miss it.It is where applications come in handy you can watch a movies for free. Btw, looking for the best app to watch free movies on your iOS phone? Then your should check Showbox Application. This is the most famous application today that has a big library of shows and movies. This app is also available for iOS smartphone users. But your need to download it first to enjoy free films showbox-all.com/download-showbox-for-ios/

cialis alternative <a href="https://cialiswithdapoxetine.com/#">cialis coupon</a>

<a href="https://cialiswithdapoxetine.com/#">can ubuy cialis on streets</a> cheap cialis

<a href="https://chloroquinesada.com/#"></a>