Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2015 19:47:27 GMT
LIT, your video was perfectly fine. What I didn't like was the videos aliveandkicking posted, because they were ridiculing Zhib Rhan. aliveandkicking, thanks for your feedback on what you think of me. I encourage you to express your critical perspective of me, although I don't completely agree with it. But it's good to receive this feedback, so I can be alerted as to possible errors I might be making. It also gets me used to reading criticism on myself without getting angry. LIT, always according to this new approach, suggested by aliveandkicking, to convert our forum from a flat earth one to a freethinking and free debate forum, I suggest you change "Space Travel Hoax" to just "Space Travel". That way we're not going to belittle those who think that Space Travel actually exists.
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on Apr 26, 2015 20:27:09 GMT
I suggest you change "Space Travel Hoax" to just "Space Travel". That way we're not going to belittle those who think that Space Travel actually exists. I think you are able to change the name of the hubble telescope hoax title you created 20 hours ago so you are not belittling the hundreds of millions of people who believe there is a space telescope? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2015 20:31:09 GMT
Oh, but that is within my freedom of speech. I started a thread with what I think. I will change it from "hoax" to "skepticism" or similar. I believe the title of the sub-forum should be neutral, whereas a member can respectfully express his skepticism within the sub-forum. But if "hoax" is offensive, I will change it to something more objective and less derogatory. There: Hubble Space Telescope: skepticism |
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on Apr 26, 2015 20:43:23 GMT
Oh, but that is within my freedom of speech. I started a thread with what I think. I will change it from "hoax" to "skepticism" or similar. I believe the title of the sub-forum should be neutral, whereas a member can respectfully express his skepticism within the sub-forum. But if "hoax" is offensive, I will change it to something more objective and less derogatory. so the sub forum should not 'belittle people' by talking about space travel hoax but it is ok for you to 'belittle people' in exactly the same manner because you are doing it in a respectful manner? I think you just need to feel more comfortable with hating and just get it over and done with. You are a hater so just hate and enjoy it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2015 20:45:41 GMT
So, what do you suggest, that I change my opinions according to your preference? I can't even express my opinion in a respectful manner? Good thing you're not administrator...
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on Apr 26, 2015 20:47:28 GMT
So, what do you suggest, that I change my opinions according to your preference? I can't even express my opinion in a respectful manner? Good thing you're not administrator... I think you just need to feel more comfortable with hating and just get it over and done with. You are a hater so just hate and enjoy it All i was doing was drawing attention to your hypocrisy that you can be critical of what LIT created while you yourself are happy to do what you have judged him for and can be seen now defending it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2015 20:56:01 GMT
There is a difference between the neutral sub-forum created by the administrator and the "opinionated" threads created by members, like me.
Feel free to keep on testing my patience, by expressing your hate / anger, and yet calling me a "hater", this is quite an interesting perspective you have.
Of course after a certain amount of insults received from you, I hope you won't be offended if I take a break, or just stop replying.
|
|
|
|
Post by aliveandkicking on Apr 26, 2015 21:21:39 GMT
There is a difference between the neutral sub-forum created by the administrator and the "opinionated" threads created by members, like me. Feel free to keep on testing my patience, by expressing your hate / anger, and yet calling me a "hater", this is quite an interesting perspective you have. Of course after a certain amount of insults received from you, I hope you won't be offended if I take a break, or just stop replying. I do not hate you. I have tried to understand and help you and gone to a considerable effort to do so. I do not see that i am insulting you by saying you are a hater. It seems to me that you hate a vast number of people who you believe are conspiring against you. I feel i need to remind you again that you the person who hated a man who took 24 hour photographs of flowers just because he took 24 hour photos of the southern sun. You are a hypocrit so i call you a hypocrit. Rather than hating perhaps you can see the love? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2015 21:32:31 GMT
Maybe it would help if you changed your avatar and your terms (and stop misrepresenting me). Anyway, I think you have insulted me plenty (within the last few days) and owe me a lot of apologies, but I still thank you for participating in this empty forum.
You certainly make it preferable for me to interact with other members, but since there are no such members, let us keep interacting for as long as I can bear you.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathen on Apr 27, 2015 0:02:02 GMT
Yes, time to merge some categories of flat earth and put them all inside "flat earth". For example, the flight routes could be put inside flat earth, and so could "maps". Right now we have too many sub-forums and too few users, and we all get lost into the many rooms of the forum. No one gets a chance to meet and to discuss, and conversations are lagging. I tend to agree with this. I like the idea of there being topics on various conspiracies, weird phenomena, different and non-mainstream theories, etc. We have some of those sections now. Basically, I watch youtube videos on all sorts of things like this, and I like this forum because I see some of those discussions on here. I also hate the youtube comments section. Personally, I hate huge forums too, but this forum definitely needs some more people and I think at this time flat earth (or concave) will attract only a small percentage of people (whether or not if it's true). And the forum name "Our World" fits pretty good with the idea of discussions on trying to figure out the various weird things of the world we live in. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2015 5:38:44 GMT
heathen, since you agree on the need for more members and discussion, are you interested in systematically engaging in respectful debates with the objective of drawing people here? I think that only by debating things we might be able to draw attention and new members here. The problem is that we have to keep our discussions respectful and without personal attacks or we risk losing the existing members (as it has already happened). If you agree that debate might achieve our objective, let us systematically look for things we disagree on, and debate them (whether it is Hitler, a vegan diet, 911, or flat earth). Let me know if you are interested in having some respectful debates, so we can start looking for things we disagree on. In fact, if you agree, you can go to one of the many threads I started, and tell me what you think. Hopefully we will find something we can disagree on, and to debate, while still respecting each other.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2015 15:05:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LIT on Apr 29, 2015 23:12:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Zhib Rhan
Apr 29, 2015 23:39:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by cobracommander on Apr 29, 2015 23:39:18 GMT
Using an article from the lying news media is poor research. He debunked his own video by using the news media instead of real science . It's always 26 passengers, 26 victims, blah blah blah. 26 is 66. 26 is the number of Sandy Hook victims. I'm trying to think of all the other hoaxes that use the 26 victim number. I'll find them. There's a bunch. |
|
|
|
Post by LIT on Apr 30, 2015 6:19:57 GMT
cobracommanderYeah, of course. I find it funny that he ridicules so much the others without looking at the quality of his own theories first. I agree with his claim that the UN flat Earth map is wrong, and it doesn't make sense. But the same applies to his alternative, so unless he wants to root for Round Earth now, I don't see why he makes all those videos spouting hate and exposing the erroneous interpretations. So I just wanted to provoke him to attempt to shed light on this controversy in his behavior.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2015 1:49:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by zero11s on May 5, 2015 20:27:24 GMT
Zhib is right, you guys are indeed in love with a image.
|
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 6, 2015 8:22:33 GMT
Do you follow his videos? What he says is hypocritical. He has demonstrated how hateful and manipulative he is, then he talks about God?!?!Who would believe such a person? I don't think anyone has the right to judge if they haven't shown a better example.
|
|
|
|
Post by zero11s on May 6, 2015 9:03:53 GMT
The more he is being attacked the more I get suspicious and his credibility rises.
|
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 6, 2015 10:35:17 GMT
Yeah, that makes sense. If someone is more wrong, you trust them more  |
|
|
|
Post by zero11s on May 6, 2015 11:30:12 GMT
Yeah, that makes sense. If someone is more wrong, you trust them more says the Globalist |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2015 14:02:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 7, 2015 15:07:55 GMT
Eric Dubay is a shill. Schpanke is a shill. Zhib is a shill. Everyone is a shill. Anyone who thinks people are serious about this is a shill. If you don't agree with me you will be put in a detention camp by Steve himself.
|
|
|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 9, 2015 4:00:02 GMT
Eric Dubay is a shill. Schpanke is a shill. Zhib is a shill. Everyone is a shill. Anyone who thinks people are serious about this is a shill. If you don't agree with me you will be put in a detention camp by Steve himself. Not everyone is a shill, but we'll soon find out that most of the Flat Earth truth and.truth community in general are shills. Even people you may like & respect could be playing you to sway you into their truth. This sudden Flat earth popularity was all by design. They knew the moon landing movie effects were going to age. This is a plan that is decades in the making, if not centuries. Do you think the 3 Star Wars movies that will be out within the next 2 years just happens to be another so called coincidence? Why push these space propaganda movies out in abundance as fast as possible? The title alone should alone should be a clear indication all this is by design. The Force Awakens as the real world awakens??? Another so called coincidence??? What's all this have to do with this thread? The "shills" you named are part of this campaign. They are alot of good Flat Earthers that care about the truth, but the top few have an interior motive that goes into the plans they have in store fir us. Our goal should be to not fall into this trap they set. Expose the phoney characters on both sides of the argument. Find our own truth, not theirs. Btw... I was referring to everyone who reads this when I said you, and not directly to you LIT. My phone battery is about to die, so I my have to edit my post later to make more sense out of what I see is taking place now. |
|
|
|
Post by cunit on May 9, 2015 8:27:33 GMT
eric dubay and mark sargent came much after flat earth got attention rising again
the whole work has been done before and just been polished by these guys and used for attention and maybe more - what should they do if the fe gets too big...infiltrate the opposition and raise all attention to the shills - possible?
|
|
|
|
Post by cobracommander on May 9, 2015 9:15:10 GMT
eric dubay and mark sargent came much after flat earth got attention rising again the whole work has been done before and just been polished by these guys and used for attention and maybe more - what should they do if the fe gets too big...infiltrate the opposition and raise all attention to the shills - possible? Flat Earth was years in the making. I'm of the belief this has been the plan since before the Moon Mission Hoax. The movie propaganda has ramped up in recent years, and will really start to pick up this year. George Lucas didn't want to make these Star Wars because he wanted no part in this Flat Earth reveal. JJ Abrams originally said no, and had to be begged to do it. Remember, Disney were the ones pushing this, whom have major ties to the space hoax. This has been years and years in the planning, much like the 9/11 predictive programming being forced upon us before the towers were even built. The Halo 5 campaign also discusses Star Wars, which is odd. I highly suspect we've been lead to this path by TPTB. |
|
|
|
Post by LIT on May 9, 2015 9:22:42 GMT
Actually, I was just angry and posted that exaggerated comment. I don't think they are shills in the classic meaning of the word. Maybe trolls is a better term. When someone doesn't make sense, but insists to be right that is trolling. I don't care how much time they spent "researching" if they cannot provide real evidence they're just wasting people's time, and they're trolling by suggesting their mediocre research actually proved anything. I don't consider them gurus or truthers or anything, because they are pathetic. Most of their "proofs" are made up and based on nothing more than wild imagination. They don't have the moral right to propagate them as truth. That is why it is a joke and trolling. Flat Earth rising in popularity might be indeed by design. The design is to test how easily people can start believing in uncorroborated ideas and consider them real and true.
|
|
