Eric Dubay

9/11 is case close. He's pushing super weapon Dearborn when it's proved DEWvand Hurricane Erin is a joke.tHe whole point if Nukes, aliens technology is to make people believe the people who think they have powerless they do not possess. The only real weapons they have are TV and.the New Media to make people believed and.needed is to strike fear in humanity, and separate them love.

Eric DuePay's logic is bunk. Consider all the predictive programing brainwashing to make the impossible possible prior to 9/11. Add to that in this silly theory that a hurricane (hurricane Erin) had to be perfectly predicted at least a half century in advance is absurd. They can't even get tomorrow's weather close to correct.

I see your points, and they are reasonable, but his work is still very useful to people. We need someone who explains the things he has read in a simple way, because some of us do not like reading (including myself). So I thank him for that. Also, in the interview at the beginning, he shows he has his theory, that he believes in it, he explains it in detail and clearly, and I thank him for this, too.

Do the same thing and you will see that it won't take you the amount of time you seem to think.

Latest interview:
Eric Dubay Flat Earth Anarchast - YouTube


ifers.boards.net/post/6355/thread


min. 1
The host says "he doesn't really come off as one of these wild crazy sort of people at all..."
That's right. He doesn't come off as one, but that's just a first impression. Spend some time on his forum and you'll find out what he's really like.

6
He defines him as "anarchist". I didn't know that. Interesting.
Now he says "he is actually a morally sound and peaceful person, which is very rare... and that's a mark up in my book any day, so... maybe I should talk to this guy and see what's going on". He is mislead, just as we have all been. As I said before, "Peace" is only in his signature. He wages war to everyone who doesn't agree on everything with him, with the exception of people who are famous, and he treats those a little bit better.

8
He explains the horizon discrepancies, with regard to the spherical earth theory

12
Natural physics of water as proof of flat earth: how can the water stay on a ball?
On how gravity is a lie, created by the freemasons to explain away all the things they can't explain.

15
"Everything can be explained by density and buoyancy" without the need for the gravity lie, says Eric.

16
Eric says we are on a flat plane, but it is a mystery how far this plane goes. Good point.

20
Eric asked the host why he thinks the earth is not flat.
The host explains his "conspiracy theorist" background.

23
The host Jeff Berwick says that he, too, is having doubts that we are living on a spinning ball.

Hmm, interesting, given that I just read this line on his Wikipedia entry:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Berwick


27-28
What a coincidence that Eric brings up the subject of circumnavigation of the globe. I wonder if Jeff will say anything about his experience now.

Nope. Jeff says nothing. Very surprising.

28-29
Eric talks about the ships on the horizon, saying things I agree with.
Yet, Jeff, despite his experience in the field, says nothing.

30
"Telescopes blur out" is the reason why we can't see at infinite distances, says Eric, answering Jeff's question on why we can't see Japan from California. Besides, it would be extremely small, even with a telescope.

Eric then discusses astronomy, the stars and mathematical lies invented to explain away discrepancies.

32
"The Hubble telescope doesn't exist" says Eric, and the images we are given are made up.

33
Question on Antarctica. It seems that Jeff is pretty much convinced, too, that the earth is flat.

34
On flight routes.

38
Still talking about the Poles, and all the inconsistencies with travelling in that area.

40
Jeff suggests this theory should be tested by travelling to those areas.

41
Eric suggests using a drone, and mentions Matt Boylan's related project.

42-43
Jeff says that there in an increasing intolerance by politicians towards "conspiracy theorists", in particular he mentions Cameron's speech at the UN:
David Cameron UN Speech United Nations PM David Cameron ISIS UK Parliament Votes Approves Airstrikes - YouTube

44
Eric mentions Charles K. Johnson:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_K._Johnson

He then mentions the "controlled opposition", of which of course we are part, too, according to his paranoid mind.

46
"density and buoyancy" again.

47
Jeff brings up the subject of God.

48
Eric analyzes the UN flat.

49
He explains how the Freemasons are behind the spherical earth lie, and how all the scientists, astronauts and propagandists are Freemasons.

52
Eric explains that no rockets ever make it to "space" or "orbit". More on these concepts of "space" and "orbit" here:
serendipitous.boards.net/post/3197/thread

He also explains that a "vacuum" cannot exist.

53
"Rockets do not go straight up" but describe a parabola, says Eric.

59
Eric talks about his forum. This is the saddest part of the interview, for us here. Because we know what that forum is really like, and of course he will not say it, but describe something else instead.

1:01
Jeff says "just the way you are and the way you talk" is a good indication that he can trust him. Well, I trust him on flat earth, but "the way he is and the way he talks" is a deception.

That is because he doesn't want people to discuss freely. You either agree with everything he says or you're a shill. In my opinion, some of his ideas are sheer disinformation, especially when he doesn't allow people to debate them. You may get indoctrinated without having the chance to hear the other side.

I won't be surprised if Eric created dummy accounts and he or his close friends operate them. Anyway, the guys are just babbling and not providing anything meaningful. If you decide to oppose their view they won't provide any good evidence, they would just call you're a shill. The whole idea to accept crazy ideas as truth even though we still lack concrete evidence is very similar to a cult or a religion of sorts. I also doubt a lot of things, but I don't believe in things which I cannot prove and don't make up fake evidence to convince others, I am right. It is easy to get confused though, and I hope they are just confused, but why they are not a bit more humble instead of being so stubborn about everything?

I agree.. He can keep his weak ass boards, pretty soon there wont be anyone left to read them anyway except him and his jerkoff moderators.

Screw Eric, after being banned from ifers for no reason, I wouldn't waste my time joining that pathetic forum. All they do is attack people and suck Erics ass. There isn't any new research or information on there anyway.. They want people to join then ban them for ridiculous reasons.. Kiss my  gay ass IFERS.